Sep 24, 2008 09:45
"Whatever the New York Times once was, it is today not by any standard a journalistic organization."
"Fahrenheit 9/11 is not a documentary."
This must be an ancient and classic rhetorical device, because it seems to work so well. Does the tactic have a name?
Leave a comment
Comments 10
Short form: "I have a premise, and I can prove it with these facts. Therefore, it must be true."
With statements alone, as listed above, the idea that there are facts to back them up is left to the reader to assume. (Here's where the psychology class comes in.) The human mind, hating a void, will work to fill that gap. A classical rhetoric will not leave that to chance but will lead the reader and make the case to ensure the correct result is found. A more maverick rhetoric leaves the statements as seen above, since the reader fills in the gaps is not as important to the creator. Or they're lazy. (This last bit is my own logic--take it as you will.)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
It depends on the intent of the speaker who said, "Fahrenheit 9/11 is not a documentary."
If you believe that the movie was, in fact, a documentary, then the statement is (as presented) merely unsupported denial. If you believe that the movie was a ranting political attack, then my initial thought of it as litotes might be accurate.
Reply
Reply
A few unannounced quizzes are not inconceivable.
War is not healthy for children and other living things.
One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day.
Reply
Leave a comment