<-- Icon used because of LOUIS STEVENS being a main character in this movie. : p
As for the movie:
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?
I mean. The movie... just... I want to forget I ever saw it.
Remember back when Star Wars episodes 1 - 3 came out? All these Star Wars nerds were sooooo horrified at midichlorians and just episodes 1 - 3
(
Read more... )
Comments 23
It's more of an Indy-themed comedy than an action film.
Also, I too need to see Iron Man again.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Although, hey, some of the friends that saw it with me loved it. : D
Reply
For me, it wasn't so much the action sequences that disappointed. It was more...hm, I guess I'd call it an issue of pacing. I felt that the action was too unevenly distributed, to the point where you'd have nothing but a bunch of exposition for a very long time, followed by a HUGE BLOCK of action that would take a good half hour or more to get through. It killed the tension and did a lot to make the action seem even more over the top than it had to be, I think - for example, the sword-fighting-on-cars thing? Fine on its own, but when combined with all of the machine guns and punching and ants and monkeys and cliffs and rivers in the same single ( ... )
Reply
I think I would've enjoyed the movie, too, but the alien thing just ruined it for me.
For me, it wasn't so much the action sequences that disappointed.
Oh, it wasn't the action scenes that were the particularly disappointing things for me. In fact, I enjoyed the action scenes more than anything else in the movie. The action was the best part of the movie, IMO.
I agree with your comments about the pacing... and that the movie was pretty! : D
Reply
Reply
You're the first person to COMLETELY agree with me.
I found the movie stupid, and the aliens ruined it for me,
The jokes were corny,
The fake town=what?
I wished I saw Prince Caspian instead.
Reply
Leave a comment