I really do sincerely wish we had more time to spend together today. You've got this exam/discussion-y thing, I've suddenly got a bunch of piano stuff I have to do...we'll probably do less-stressed celebrating tomorrow. How's "Doctor Who" tomorrow night sound? 9:30-ish, since that's when Dani has time? We might be able to "Buffy" tonight, as well, even though I have an exam tomorrow.
I love you. A lot. There will be plenty of celebrating soon.
Gina ended up throwing a cup full of pondwater at me. Fortunately, I have Uncanny Dodge, so it mostly just splashed my arm. Ok, maybe it'd be a successful reflex save. I'm not sure which.
Trolls that live under bridges
anonymous
June 8 2007, 06:46:22 UTC
Alexander, I don't know you, but I know your type. I don't have the stomach or the energy at this point in time to go looking through your livejournal to check, but I'm willing to bet you're one of James' friends. You guys all remind me of Cho Seung-Hui except you're somewhat lacking in the testicles department, although just as capable when it comes to sliminess.
Honestly, I don't which is crazier--the fact that you're trolling on some long-forgotten post from 2004, or that you condescendingly invite me to an "intellectual" atmosphere on a site that is, seemingly, a mechanism for you to display your oh-so-original LJ quizzes and time-wasting questionnaires. I can already feel my IQ points rising.
Apparently you share James' atrocious spelling and grammar habits, too. It's "exaggerate," not "exxagerate," and "liar," not "lier." Not that it'll help you all that much, but you get taken a tad more seriously if you can actually write properly.
Re: Trolls that live under bridgesthegr8sephirothJune 9 2007, 16:01:20 UTC
You are an excellent example of why I tend to lock most of my posts now. Incidentally, that would be why you're mostly seeing quizzes. You don't know "my type." I don't have a "type." I am one of James' friends, but I am not by any definition "slimy". I also don't particularly appreciate being compared to a murderer, but I can see why you might choose that as a means of anonymous character assassination. Trolling, to me, implies seeking attention by starting arguments specifically for the sake of conflict. I don't do this. The fact that I identify myself and you do not, in fact, makes me relatively insensitive to your accusations of trolling. While I have misspelled "exaggerate" I don't believe I've ever misspelled the word "liar." I have answered your claims. Now either identify yourself or leave me alone.
Comments 13
Sarah
Reply
I love you. A lot. There will be plenty of celebrating soon.
Oh, and good luck on your discussion stuff. :-P
Reply
Reply
Reply
Honestly, I don't which is crazier--the fact that you're trolling on some long-forgotten post from 2004, or that you condescendingly invite me to an "intellectual" atmosphere on a site that is, seemingly, a mechanism for you to display your oh-so-original LJ quizzes and time-wasting questionnaires. I can already feel my IQ points rising.
Apparently you share James' atrocious spelling and grammar habits, too. It's "exaggerate," not "exxagerate," and "liar," not "lier." Not that it'll help you all that much, but you get taken a tad more seriously if you can actually write properly.
Reply
You don't know "my type." I don't have a "type." I am one of James' friends, but I am not by any definition "slimy". I also don't particularly appreciate being compared to a murderer, but I can see why you might choose that as a means of anonymous character assassination.
Trolling, to me, implies seeking attention by starting arguments specifically for the sake of conflict. I don't do this. The fact that I identify myself and you do not, in fact, makes me relatively insensitive to your accusations of trolling. While I have misspelled "exaggerate" I don't believe I've ever misspelled the word "liar."
I have answered your claims. Now either identify yourself or leave me alone.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Leave a comment