Regarding: Boys
Outside the one male I've been interested in for a little over a year or so - completely on an emotional and physical level, and he is perfectly aware of how I feel - I can think of one other male that is actually adorable enough for me to crush on in that fun sort of way. (*waves to
g00n*) For the rest of you male readers out there,
(
Read more... )
Comments 48
Reply
More often than not, it is because people don't grok my perspective of polyamory/polygymy that I run into the issues of men - almost never women - who mistake my tendencies and personality for more than platonic intentions.
When Harry Met Sally is campy and fun, but I almost wonder if there isn't some truth to the assertion that men and women can't truly be friends. I hate to think so, but I'm currently feeling somewhat put out, so I am giving it some thought.
Reply
What I found, when I would refer to myself as 'bi' in front of some men, they would automatically assume that meant I (and whomever I was seeing at that point) were 'bookends' for whatever they wanted. Rather, I had always meant it more as 'love does not hide in gender'.
I have often in the past wondered if opposite sex people can be just friends or not - Whether it is because of implications from society or otherwise, I am inclined to believe t hat, unfortunately, they usually cannot. There are, as always, exceptions to the rule, I am sure.
And also, I adore your user pic. One of my favourites :)
Reply
i think anyone can be friends with anyone. but then again, i do not think that sexual feelings necessarily negate feelings of friendship. someone can be attracted to a friend - can desire a friend - and still be a good friend. the feelings are all pretty normal and natural, you know? they just happen and i do not think it is an opposite gender thing. just a sexuality thing.
like, if one says "two lesbians can't be friends cause sex will get in the way" most people would shake their heads and disagree. yanno? i just woke up but yeah, i'm not sure. uhm, yah. crawling into the shower now. :)
- emily
Reply
Reply
I think they can, but I've always had far better relationships with men than women, with very few of the male friends involving sex. It's the relationships with women that I have a significant amount of trouble with, always have.
There are a lot of underlying reasons, from the relationship with my mother compaired to the relationship with my dad, to the fact that I've had several female friends betray and stomp on me that mean I am the way that I am.
In the end, I think that we all have tendencies as to the type of person we get along wiht the best, male or female.
For what ever is going on, *hug*
Reply
While I have often felt I do better in male friendships than I do with females, I have also noticed that the males are likely to be the ones mistaking my genuine, exuberant, and purely platonic affection for something more. While there've been a couple insane girlfriends/wives, the ratio is much higher to the detriment of my faith in men as rational human beings with an shred of non-egocentric reality.
Before anyone jumps on me for that statement, I'll grant that I am currently irritable with a particular situation, and I know there are exceptions. Cranky Morrigan today.
Reply
"Everyone is normal, until you get to know them."
Reply
My standard for a rational human being (relatively speaking, I should have clarified that) is one who will talk *to* me instead of *about* me and can clearly delineate (I'm willing to give leeway for emotions to cool) the line between trust and assumption.
If you ask me a question, I'll give you an honest answer. And if I don't feel I can give the entire answer for one reason or another, I will tell you. Upfront.
Reply
*grin*
Seriously, though, a couple points. One, remember that males, in general, are clueless. Or, at least, don't appreciate subtle signals. Don't hold it against us. Most of us know and appreciate that "No," whatever it is said to, means "No." We just don't always understand if "Um" means "No," and often will interpret unclear signals in a manner most favorable to us.
Two, remember that there are degrees between wide open and completely shut down. I'll promise not to be a bull running through your china shop, if you'll promise to clearly mark where the aisles are.
I don't like muddy air.
I think I'm going to withhold comment on this statement coming from a chain smoker...
Reply
No subtle signals here. Just me. I may not completely be the "what you see is what you get" type, but I'm also pretty upfront. Every single person (except perhaps g00n, although he shouldn't be surprised) that I have more than platonic emotions for is well aware. They are all also well aware that - barring certain circumstances - it's just a harmless crush. Fun. Not serious.
Don't hold it against us. Most of us know and appreciate that "No," whatever it is said to, means "No." We just don't always understand if "Um" means "No," and often will interpret unclear signals in a manner most favorable to us.See, this is what I don't get. If the interpretation is favorable to the male, but there is angsting and moaning about the awkwardness or whatever, how is that precisely favorable? Unless you're telling me that crushes the male can unrequite and the subsequent likelihood of conversational drama is favorable ( ... )
Reply
Reply
If, for instance, the male is in a relationship, how does favorable translate into getting someone else in bed? Along with inherent awkwardness and drama?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The Apcolypse.
Rainbows and bunnies.
Storms and thunderclouds.
Oh, wait. You weren't asking for general life answers.
Probably because the bill of the platypus would make live birthing awkward?
:-)
Reply
I was on the moon. With Steve.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment