What the hell, Supreme court?

Jun 01, 2010 18:07

In a 5-4 decision in the case of Berghuis v. Thompkins, the Supreme Court has ruled that suspects must explicitly assert their right to remain silent under the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona decision.

NYT link here, full ruling here, and the SCOTUSblog breaks it down here.

Is it just me, or does this seem VERY messed up? I mean, if a suspect invokes ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

turandot June 2 2010, 02:51:20 UTC
To me, it looks like this ruling sets up someone's "right to remain silent" now as something only that is recognizable if an educatd suspect knows what magic words to say in order to invoke that right.

That's precisely why Sotomayor, who's got more than a little experience in criminal justice, lambasted the majority in her dissent. This decision pretty much goes counter what Miranda was doing: protecting those who are not savvy enough to be able to navigate the legal system.

Reply


nbda1997 June 3 2010, 14:33:11 UTC
I think that the Amanda Knox case provides a good example of the shoe being on the other foot. Here we have an American, who (contrary to popular belief) does NOT speak fluent Italian, being interrogated by Roman police for over two and a half days. She was emotionally and physically coerced into telling the police anything that would make them leave her alone. Sure, you have the right to remain silent even in Italy, but anyone would break after non-stop interrogation like that.

And she ends up being convicted based on the prosecutions case which claims that she murdered the girl in some sort of "demonic sex game" (?????). I don't think for one second that this sort of case would fly if Amanda had been from Italy.

My point is, when the shoe is on the other foot, its easy to get riled up. That being said, we should take it as an example of how not to treat suspects just because English isn't their first language and we have a preconceived notion about who they are solely based on their race/ethnicity.

Reply

theotherbaldwin June 3 2010, 15:57:35 UTC
Re: Amanda Knox-- that is seriously messed up.

And the point you raised was one I hadn't even considered: how adversely can and will this affect people whose first language isn't English?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up