Torture Time

May 13, 2008 19:22

The apocalypse has come in the form of whatever disaster you desire it to be. You are left with two, and only two choices of possible mates to help you carry on the intelligent species. One of those options has a rough similarity to Terri Schiavo, only possibly worse (BUT STILL ABLE TO KEEP UP THE HEAT). The other is intelligent, thoughtful, caring ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 14

rchevalier May 14 2008, 10:36:54 UTC
...I'll take the cockroach. Might, um, grow on me after a while.

Query: does this mean that the neo-human race is going to be... half cockroach? Since that'd bump our survival chances a fair bit. Cockroaches have been around for how many years, compared to humans?

We'd be like... the MASTER RACE. Except not as pretty as funky-moustache-man was probably thinking.

Reply

thesurvivalist May 16 2008, 04:39:01 UTC
HELL YES

We will be everlasting and you will be deified for your great action to better mankind. You > Eve.

Reply

rchevalier May 18 2008, 15:38:29 UTC
I'd get to wear more than fig leafs, right?

Reply


ria_chan May 14 2008, 17:57:03 UTC
Mutated cockroach would just be gross. (eww...) Terri Schiavo. Uh. Yeah. No other comments.

And there's only one person that I'd like to do the naughty with: Dita von Teese. ¦D

Reply

thesurvivalist May 16 2008, 04:37:18 UTC
Terry Schiavo is not the weirdest fetish I've heard about.

I think it's the sneezing fetish, but I've heard worse. Much worse.

Reply


gussiki May 14 2008, 20:06:39 UTC
@Alde:
Oh yeah, not only that, but cockroaches are almost invincible. They can live almost anywhere on the planet, can survive ages without food or water by slipping into a coma (and be revived with just a few drops of water), survive massive doses of radiation, and so on.

Anyway, um, I have to reply? Disgusting as the cockroach is, I think it's better for the future of intelligent species.

Or, if it's within the rules to do so, I could just wait until one of the two dies off. Survival of the fittest. [/really ignoring many things here]

Reply

thesurvivalist May 16 2008, 04:36:02 UTC
Damn, are you not reading the fine print. DON'T CHOOSE, YOU GET THIS:


... )

Reply

gussiki May 16 2008, 19:17:34 UTC
Which is why I asked if it was an option. That's technically not choosing to not choose. [/confusing]

Reply


anordir May 15 2008, 07:04:52 UTC
If the main purpose is to carry on the species, I'd go with the Terri Schiavo option, because reproducing with a cockroach wouldn't carry on the human species. Otherwise, cockroach. Hey, love is blind, right? :D *shudders slightly* Besides, you said the cockroach's personality is basically yours. TRANSFERENCE FOR THE WIN =P

This reminds me of a quote I once heard on deciding between two potential mates: "Use an axe on both of them. The one who survives is the wrong one. Take him anyway. Love grows." [/horribly paraphrased]

Reply

gussiki May 15 2008, 19:57:32 UTC
But doesn't it ask you to continue the intelligent species, and not necessarily the human species?

Besides, you said the cockroach's personality is basically yours. TRANSFERENCE FOR THE WIN =P
Ah yes, that factor changes everything. :P

Reply

thesurvivalist May 16 2008, 04:40:34 UTC
Who needs to be human? All you need to be is smart.

Reply


lulu_of_schiz May 16 2008, 02:02:56 UTC
I've got a, like, phobia of bugs, so. Yeah. I'd take the first one--andOMGSUPERNATURALSTOPDISTRACTINGMEWITHYOURSEXYANGST--but I'd have to close my eyes because that's just Wrong, you freak.

If I could bang anyone...geez that's hard there are so many choices. I'd totally do Daniel Radcliffe. He can lose his wand in my Great Hall any day. <3

Reply

thesurvivalist May 16 2008, 04:24:29 UTC
Of course it's wrong. I am a very wrong person.

Dude, aim for the squid in the lake. MUCH BETTER CHOICE AMIRITE?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up