Comments | thethirdeye04: (без темы)

thethirdeye04

(Untitled)

Nov 17, 2004 00:25

WHY is nature immediately associated with good? Why do companies use the word “nature” to portray their product as viable and healthy? I seem to remember nature being the true source of dioxins. I seem to remember nature containing the radon under the houses that lead to so many deaths. I seem to remember nature being responsible for the advent ( Read more... )

Comments 7

yeah, i don't trust doctors anonymous November 17 2004, 16:47:54 UTC

Well doctors are full of it a great deal of the time. they told my mom that she had a psychological problem and put her on 160 mg of oxy contin (a synthetic heroine mind you). Surprise surprise, five months later they had to apologize because she ended up going into a surgery so the doctors could replace all of the titanium (rods, screws, etc.) because it had been eaten away by a staff infection. Some psychological problem. Great people we are so freely giving our money to.

I know that has very little to do with your entry, but oh well.

That sucks. anonymous December 1 2004, 06:08:36 UTC

Hey Karl ( ... )

anonymous December 11 2004, 09:29:12 UTC

wait, Karl, by ADHD you surely mean, ADHND; Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Non-Disorder... disorder [haha]
it=not a disorder the brain of someone who has this "disorder" produces more Theta waves[in varying degrees] than that of the average brain and fewer beta waves making the person inattentive and "drowsy". so at a young age the person learns to compensate for the neural "abnormalities" by increased physical activity or in the case of ADD, rapid and sporadic thought processes; both methods cause the person to be more alert by increasing beta wave activity/count... wow I'm bored oh and i saw the whole Jared debacle/fiasco... "oh, he so schooled you, Karl." ... haha, just kidding Karl

...so how does everyone feel about a "Acerbic 15 year old" although i am not really shrewd and i'm not bitter either hmm... well i'm rude, i guess, sometimes... well it's a start.

BIOS stands for... BUTT input output system... [snickers giddily ( ... )

thethirdeye04 December 11 2004, 23:55:19 UTC

trent perhaps...by the way, enjoyed the reply...
-karl

Grant Says anonymous March 2 2005, 21:33:59 UTC

Dude...If you knew one thing about doctors you would know they are getting paid for the bullshit they say in the advertisements...And i do belive a cardiologist can have a say in a bowflex commercial simply because excersise can lead to a healthy heart and also have many other benifits as well...However should the doctor be talking about muscle growth? In a since yes. Not the visible muscles we see, which he probably wanted viewers to think and in your part you made an exact point, but the heart as a muscle. Increased activity of the heart can in turn stregthen it and cause it to become a stronger heart. Enhancing the cardiac muscle. I do agree with you that doctors should not be trusted for everything. How can you expect one man to have all the answers of the world. Most of the time doctors can get away with false perscriptions unneccesary surgury and other nonsense simply because the patients or viewers in this case do not have the intellectual values or education and training doctors have so the inferior tend to trust some ( ... )

Re: Grant Says thethirdeye04 March 2 2005, 22:21:33 UTC

“its ability to induce muscle building”… this was my only assertion… the anabolic nature of “BowFlex” as advertised should not have been corroborated by a cardiologist. Now I realize the inherent point here (involving cardiac hypertrophy) but there was a definite misrepresentation present. I know several cardiologists (through my father’s work) and they may or may not know as much about than you, me, or any other joe. The problem is that they are trusted (as you agreed). The fact I was addressing was that if they were supporting “BowFlex” as a cardiovascular fitness machine they should have said so…otherwise they shouldn’t be trusted in reference to anabolism.

Re: Grant Says thethirdeye04 March 2 2005, 22:29:36 UTC

By the way, I know you’d be disappointed if I didn’t so…

It’s “believe” (not “belive”), “exercise” (not “excersise”), “benefits” (not “benifits”), “strengthen” (not “stregthen”), “prescriptions” (not “perscriptions”), “unnecessary” (not “unneccesary”), and “surgery” (not “surgury”)… I know it’s not necessary to entertain these pretensions habits but what the hell… it’s my journal right?