that doesn't provide a single coherent justification for what's happening, and provides a number of reasons that can be ripped to shreds in less time than it takes to read it. at this point, israel is still to blame.
My love, I always took you for a liberal and, what's more, a person with a strong sense of moral uprightness. I don't recall hearing you stick up for born-again Christian and United States commander-in-chief George W. Bush when he decided to do a preemptive strike that resulted in the deaths of so many civilians. Why should Israel be any different? No group of people has the right to blow the heads off of beautiful little Lebanese babies, be they Muslim, Jewish, or even Scientologist, and the fact remains that nobody is blowing off more baby heads than Israel. Hardly a thing to give props for. Forever yours, Patrick
I'm not saying it's right, my dear. It's wrong. The article says it's a lose-lose situation. I just wanted to show that anything Israel did would be the wrong thing to do; either way, Israel would lose, and we can't hate them and scourge their name simply because they picked one of two evils. George Bush's pre-emptive strike was a political tactic and based on false information. The sites Israel has bombed were, in fact, sites of rocket launchers and missiles and such, and they knew this beforehand. Hezbullah had every intention of striking; Israel's was pre-emptive, yes, but not on flimsy and estimated information like the USA's
( ... )
Comments 3
Reply
Forever yours,
Patrick
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment