Lemonadestand
anonymous
April 8 2005, 06:42:18 UTC
Not everyone, everything, and every action is as simple and single layered as you think. You need to go out into the world and discover this for yourself, leave that comfortable chair and cozy city you live in. Until you build up the tenacity to learn what other pepole actually feel you'll just keep reciting these lame abstract ideas that you believe sums up everyone around you. You are nothing new nor different. I've read every single one of these thoughts written with close to the exact same words by other authors. Next time i want to see you cite your sources.
Re: LemonadestandthreeoffensiveApril 8 2005, 07:06:38 UTC
No, unfortunately, things are single layered. We live on one plane. Few are capable of extending their minds to a higher plane, and I've met maybe 3 people who are able.
I observe everything but discover nothing. Seeming to be an intelligent person, you would know that every thought has a predecessor. In fact, I'm willing to bet that these other "thoughts" you've read in close to the exact same words as mine, have some sort of ambiguous reply to them in almost the exact words as yours. How about you cite our sources for us :)
Re: Lemonadestand
anonymous
April 9 2005, 01:50:25 UTC
You just said in your first statement that first there is only one plane second theres another plane. You equal nothing. You say you observe everything but discover nothing, you're nothing but cute little quotes that can't be argued against when they infact mean nothing. My reply was not ambiguos. Apply that word to your original ramblings. I can see that you do not enter or open a discussion with an open mind, seeing as no matter what i say you will nitpick and try to get around it. You are a nothing.
Re: LemonadestandthreeoffensiveApril 9 2005, 08:57:17 UTC
I enter arguements with a closed mind?
Interesting. I've never noticed that before, thank you for enlightening me.
Your reply was ambiguous, and so were my "original ramblings." Don't bother disputing that, you can't argue against it. Then again, everything is subjective.
Curious, how is my "nitpicking" and trying to get around "it" justified? Wait, one better, how is it any different than what you're doing currently?
Comments 49
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I observe everything but discover nothing. Seeming to be an intelligent person, you would know that every thought has a predecessor. In fact, I'm willing to bet that these other "thoughts" you've read in close to the exact same words as mine, have some sort of ambiguous reply to them in almost the exact words as yours. How about you cite our sources for us :)
Reply
You equal nothing.
You say you observe everything but discover nothing, you're nothing but cute little quotes that can't be argued against when they infact mean nothing.
My reply was not ambiguos. Apply that word to your original ramblings.
I can see that you do not enter or open a discussion with an open mind, seeing as no matter what i say you will nitpick and try to get around it.
You are a nothing.
Reply
Interesting. I've never noticed that before, thank you for enlightening me.
Your reply was ambiguous, and so were my "original ramblings." Don't bother disputing that, you can't argue against it. Then again, everything is subjective.
Curious, how is my "nitpicking" and trying to get around "it" justified? Wait, one better, how is it any different than what you're doing currently?
Reply
Leave a comment