Today I read
keith418's pieces on
SMART goals for the OTO. The SMART formula seems workable enough, although I am always wary of
smarmy, over-marketed planning models. We might ask why we should concentrate on goals and strategy rather than on requirements, whether a matrix organization or a traditional hierarchy would better fit the organizational goals,
(
Read more... )
Comments 16
I wanted to say - good point. I think some of the changes in the OTO regarding Liber CI were definitely advancements, in particular regarding "the frontal duty of womankind" or the human rights issue. I suppose my objection was primarily to the fact that they don't obligate members to materially aid one another, or the group(outside of dues). I think the parts of Liber CI regarding the material incorporation of the OTO were wise.
Personally, I don't think Crowley was the be-all and end-all of anything. He had a lot of good ideas. A lot of screwy ones too, esp. regarding the Jewish people, sexual boundaries and violence.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment