Comments | timeticksaway: dream ★ 008

timeticksaway

dream ★ 008

Oct 18, 2009 01:57

( Filter: Public )

!somarium, the ladies~, gil, !ic, !dream post, the technique

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

kyudousha October 18 2009, 16:24:50 UTC

[She... looks a little annoyed.]

... I don't get it.

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 21:23:34 UTC

I suppose yes.

[ A bit quietly, almost aside ]

After all, you can't really blame a person for thinking that he or she has lived his or her life with open eyes, when in in fact, that's not true.

kyudousha October 18 2009, 21:27:25 UTC

[She catches that. Considers it.]

... then aren't we just using that as an excuse?

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 21:31:12 UTC

Only if the person actually didn't believe in it. There's a difference, I would think~

kyudousha October 18 2009, 21:38:16 UTC

[She... doesn't see a difference. This conversation has just shaken all that she believed in to the core. So thanks for that. :/ A breath.]

... there's only one answer, though. Belief... should have nothing to do with it.

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 21:39:46 UTC

[ How Oz can do that is a mystery, sob. ]

Really? I think it should have a lot to do with it.

To protect someone ... That's a controversial statement sometimes. If you're doing something to protect someone else, it may not justify it completely, but to some degree.

kyudousha October 18 2009, 21:43:39 UTC

[;A; Oh this situation. Estelle. She becomes irrationally angered at that, and you can feel her discomfort.]

... It shouldn't justify anything at all. That's- That's not a good reason to justify anything with at all!

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 21:59:20 UTC

[ He doesn't mean it! ... Well he does, but he doesn't mean to make Rita upset ;; ]

How?

kyudousha October 18 2009, 22:04:15 UTC

[That icon is making me upset. B| <3 And don't worry about it. It's just a tantrum. :/]

'Protecting someone'. How can that justify anything at all? It doesn't matter if you want to protect someone! You- You have to do it in a way they'd want you to- And if you don't find out, then you're not really protecting anyone at all!

That's just- You can't...

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 22:05:23 UTC

[ Sure. Suuuure. ]

I didn't know there was a dictionary definition on protecting someone~...

kyudousha October 18 2009, 22:06:44 UTC

[:/]

... there has to be some kind of standard, you know?

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 22:09:21 UTC

...Then there has to be a standard of things like friendship too, huh?

kyudousha October 18 2009, 22:10:41 UTC

[... why is he digging into all of these topics that she can't possibly connect to /sob]

... What are you trying to get at?

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 22:11:44 UTC

I suppose what I'm saying is that there's just some things that don't need a concrete definition. They change person to person.

kyudousha October 18 2009, 22:15:02 UTC

But that's just wrong, isn't it?

If something doesn't have a solid definition, then you really can't prove that it exists.

timeticksaway October 18 2009, 22:18:39 UTC

Then what about gravity and life? ...I'm pretty sure there's only theories that come close, but they're definitely not solid.

Back to all threads