http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2268521/ Only if he's the guy who gets left for the love interest... It would be as poorly judged casting as
the other people in that other classic event of 2010 "Let's do a New York Jewish couple film without the city or culture"and all the MF fans will see it
http://youtu.be/ph-o-rQgByk I SAW THAT FILM. I WAS THE ONLY PERSON IN THAT CINEMA SCREEN SEATING 250 THAT SATURDAY EVENING AND THEY STILL RAN IT FOR ME. But that film does boast the best no-dialogue introduction shot of nearly eight minutes that has production quality all over it.
Nope, I still love Sherly. And am still annoyed with actors who google themselves constantly pretending not to know the results. How else would he get all that work unless at some point he emailed or phoned people back. Let's face it, the Independent reviewer who wrote The first time round, it was the more intuitively "natural" casting of Cumberbatch (a dab hand at semi-comically preoccupied intellectuals - e.g. Sherlock Holmes) in cruelly distant, arrogantly self-involved boffin-mode as Frankenstein. got it absolutely right then with Broadly speaking, Cumberbatch emphasises the intellectual edge of both roles; Lee Miller takes us further into the feeling. The latter superbly communicates the Creature's aching need for contact in the scene where Frankenstein tricks and torments him with the sight and touch of a beautiful Bride only to hack her to bits. Cumberbatch is brilliant at conveying the blackly ridiculous aspects of the hubristic Scientist. Just be the baddy not the romantic lead, Kthxbai. BC also stands for Bruce Campbell.
http://youtu.be/Yg6bZSM48vU