(Untitled)

[tisiphone]

So. Tell me about book sorting! My problem: around 800 books across a very, very wide range of subjects, with two subjects (anthropology and science fiction (top level genre)) dominating. How finely grained a sort do you find useful? Are thematic sorts useful? (For example, I have a collection of books to do with London, and another to do with

Comments

[cos]

For a long time at home I used to sort by association, meaning books I associated with each other went together. That could mean books from the same period of my life, as much as it could mean books on the same topic, or books in a similar style. Also by size/format.

Since my last move in 2006, I've kept a few shelves deliberately heterogeneous. These shelves generally represent most of my book collection, and also always have a few books from the "to read" pile.

[also_huey]

My first wife and I (both of us just a little OCD) used a simplified Dewey for non-fiction and by format and then alpha by author for fiction. I kept that when I moved out, until the Great Hardwood Floor Refinishing When Everything Moved.

Now, I use the "it's all in a big shitfuck" method, which offends me just barely not enough to do something about it until I finish painting the house and move all the bookshelves again.

[grail76]

For fiction, I just separated them by genre and then sorted by author.

[polyfrog]

Fiction is all fiction; trying to categorize it beyond that just makes me sad when I have to try to deal with the edge cases. It gets filed by author and title, with the author I am most likely to think of being preferred if there are multiple.

Non-fiction is broadly by subject then title. (Not author because I'm more likely to remember the title if I don't remember both author and title. That is, "That book with the bad teapot on the cover...The Design Of Everyday Things", not "That book about design by Donald Norman...") Choose subjects that make sense to you; you're not making a library for other people; if you can find what you're looking for, that's perfect. The system is by nature an extension of your idiolect.

[tisiphone]

Oh yes, I'm not looking for a prescription - just suggestions! Currently, it's not organized to my satisfaction at all, and I'm hoping to come up with a plan before shuffling them around.

[darquis]

there's over 1k books in my room alone. thesauri and dictionaries together on an easily accessible shelf. might-be-useful uni crap on another shelf. F/SF /mostly/ together, not arranged in any meaningful way beyond keeping series in one place.
the rest is mixed randomly, depending on where I had room to stick something after I was done reading. I more or less remember where to find specific books because the spines are all so different, I tend to remember glancing over them while trying to find something else. Paiv is trying to introduce some semblance of order into my library, but... meh!

[jabber]

So, this prompts me to ask, how many dictionaries and thesauri are too many? In general, how many reference books on any subject is too many to actually own - but language specifically? The range of words mostly overlaps and the definitions better be pretty darn consistent, right? There's value in getting a well-rounded, comprehensive definitions from more than one source, and full coverage of the breadth of the subject domain is essential, but at what point is there too much redundancy to warrant adding one more book?

As for heterogeneous shelves, do you see much value in adding dividers or spacers between groups? Labels maybe?

[darquis]

dunno about too many, my preference is for one bilingual, one monolingual and one pocket dictionary for each foreign language. it's somewhat obsolete in the google era and several of my en-pl dictionaries and reference books are older than I, but I'm too sentimental to toss 'em.

for me personally spacers would be pointless - I wouldn't stick to labels [barely care enough to put briefs and socks into their respective drawers], and other types of dividers would eat up valuable real estate. they might be handy for more organized people, though.