Having heard today's
news that public funding for university teaching in the UK is more or less going to stop (79% cut, the remaining pittance to be targeted at 'strategic' fields e.g. clinical medicine, nursing, science, technology and modern languages)...[*]
...and that the
proposed way of making up the shortfall is to jack up tuition fees, to
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
Reply
That depends a lot on how many people you're supporting and where you live, no?
Raising a family in London and saving towards a house would presumably be nearly impossible on that take-home, but it's also presumably the case that anyone trying to raise a family in London is going to have an income above the median starting salary.
Outside of London, what's the UK's cost of living?
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'm still working out what I think about Browne (yes, I know, I'm supposed to hate it, but there are some things in there I don't completely disagree with), but the fee-repayment looks like a graduate tax except with a point at which you stop if you are able to fully repay, and a fairly generous starting point. The money you have borrowed goes immediately to the university when you start, rather than into the general taxation pot several years later, where it may or may not get hypothecated back to the university.
Reply
The current system in which all students are given subsidised rock-bottom interest rates on their loans - criticised by some as an unnecessary expense - would end.
Graduates would start repaying their loans once they earn more than £21,000 - up from the current threshold of £15,000 - at a rate of 9 per cent. At £6,000 fees, students could have to repay £30,000 in fees and living costs.
as referring to the interest rate on the loan, rather than the proportion of their income. I will have to re-run the numbers if that is not in fact the case.
As hinted in my original post, most of my unhappiness about all this comes from the way that job prospects in my field are now shot utterly to hell, rather than the tuition fee issue itself.
Reply
Students with “higher earnings after graduation” will pay a real rate of interest on the outstanding balance of their fees and cost-of-living loans.
This interest rate “will be equal to the government’s cost of borrowing (inflation plus 2.2 per cent)”, the review says.
Low-income graduates who fail to make it above the earnings threshold would not be charged interest, and their loan balance would rise in line with inflation, while those earning just above the threshold, whose repayments do not cover the interest costs, “will have the rest of the interest rebated to them by government”. The review notes: “Crucially, the lowest 20 per cent of earners on average will pay less than they do today.”
* If you make <£21k, the interest rate on your loans is equal to inflation, and you're not paying them off ( ... )
Reply
Reply
This looks like something that's going to significantly increase income inequality and decrease social mobility. If the total is 42k# total for Oxford though, I think the UK is still better off than the US...for now.
Reply
Leave a comment