jesus.

Dec 26, 2004 19:36

Leave a comment

Comments 6

veil_your_scars December 27 2004, 00:59:26 UTC
So that's why the Romans killed him. It all make's sense now. Lmfao, some people have too much time on their hands. Personally, I care more about if he even existed, than whether he was gay or straight.

Reply

_eleka_nahmen_ December 27 2004, 06:01:43 UTC
veil_your_scars, your icon is...lovely.

Reply

veil_your_scars December 28 2004, 14:43:43 UTC
Thank you. =]

Reply


shut_eyes December 27 2004, 03:54:32 UTC
very interesting indeed.

hmm..

Reply


puddleoffluf December 27 2004, 22:17:06 UTC
thats so cool

Reply


_posed_to_death December 28 2004, 05:32:51 UTC
actually more likely it was that the romans wanted to slander jesus' name because after all they were the ones crucifiying him....it was common in those days to spread lies and stuff like that about the empire's enemies i disticntly remmeber hearing about that in 7th gade humanities. - all of the difect and "irefutable" evidence for jesus' sexuality comes from roman documents and the rest are just inferred from bible passages.

dude i dont believe in jesus im an atheist, but come on just use your heads people.....

oh this is kk by the way not mb

Reply


Leave a comment

Up