i'm not sure whether this is so obvious that someone will have thought of it already, or so crazy that it won't make sense. so. . .
proposition: since _rose_, the relationship between the doctor and his female companion has been mirrored in the relationship between the companion's mother and the companion's father.
more specifically, how the
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
So, yes I do see a strong paternal streak in him with his companions aside from the now immortal Jack who has the life experience to be equal.
Reply
i think that the way he says "so sorry" (whenever he does) sounds pretty paternal, too, thinking about it. ..
Reply
To the OP: Interesting thoughts! I hadn't actually noticed what you pointed out. Hmm, I'll have to think about that for a bit.
Reply
please do think about it. am i totally off track, or have i discovered one of the dramatic sekrets of RTD?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
In the opening to "Father's Day" Rose gives Pete's birth year as 1953. That makes him 5 years older than me. When Jackie was 40, I was 48 thus Pete would have been 53, which is consistent with the amount of time it would have taken in his adult life to build a company that size. That makes him 13 years older than Jackie, older man, see where I'm going?
Oh, that's interesting! And since Jackie's 40 in January 2007 as per Rise of the Cybermen she would have been about 19 when she married Pete. (Of course, this is assuming the Father's Day maths gets everyone else right, considering it has Rose as 17 years old)
Reply
Reply
(i'm not sure i would argue it, but i'm trying to figure out why that's not usually brought out as a positive about RTD's writing of over 30 women.)
Reply
Leave a comment