1. What did you think of the format where the two switched off writing their own sections and then had the one combining the two? Did you find it effective?
Sure. I thought it was pretty seamlessly edited together, and their voices are distinct enough that it made for an easy read.
2. After reading Jennifer's section of the book, did you find
(
Read more... )
Comments 3
>>The idea is that you're innocent until proven guilty<<
Now, here's an interesting tidbit. I'm not 100% it's true, but I remember hearing/reading that, in England (or maybe Belgium, now that I think about it, I might have read it in my Deviant Sociology text and he visited Belgium), you're guilty until proven innocent. It sounds jaw-dropping at first, but the idea is that being guilty until being proven innocent puts the burden of proof on innocence rather than guilt. So the courts aren't there to prove someone's guilty, the courts are there to prove someone's innocent.
It's an interesting outlook, I think.
Reply
Definitely agree. As a point of interest, I chatted with a trial judge some years back, and he told me it was his personal policy never to give jail time to someone who wasn't a violent offender, if he could avoid it. In particular, he said locking folks up for drug charges bugged him, because all jail time did was turn them into real criminals.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment