008 - [Text] Boredom, boredom

Aug 11, 2010 20:26

Welcome to our new arrivals. I mean that sincerely. The usual sarcasm is redundant at this point. The same comments are made every month, and it gets tiring to hear after a while. You'll learn for yourselves how this place operates soon enough.

To everyone else, I believe we're overdue for another flood. I suggest battening down the metaphorical ( Read more... )

socializing, "socializing" is a euphemism, hayley is better than rorschach, dramaaa, martha, kind of a bitch, culture and classy talk

Leave a comment

Comments 259

royal_serge August 12 2010, 02:43:36 UTC
Thank you very kindly for the welcome, sir. My name is Constable Benton Fraser, and it's a pleasure.

Ah, a philosophical discussion. How pleasant! But first, I have to note- your questions ... they rely rather heavily on the 'no win scenario', don't they?

Reply

triggered_it August 12 2010, 02:51:09 UTC
Benton Fraser, it is a pleasure. Adrian Veidt.

As for the 'no win scenario' that's part of the point of utilitarianism and philosophy in general: to deduce a correct and logical answer from seemingly insoluble problems.

Sometimes sacrifices have to be made for the greater good but at what cost, and who is willing to make those sacrifices?

Reply

royal_serge August 12 2010, 03:07:59 UTC
It's good to meet you, Mister Veidt.

Ah, but in my experience, there is no such thing as a no-win scenario. There's always a third option. I've also discovered that the logical answer and the correct answer are not always the same thing.

As to your premise, of course sacrifices are sometimes necessary, but you can only chose whether or not to make sacrifices yourself. It's not right to chose to force others to make sacrifices.

Reply

triggered_it August 12 2010, 03:12:30 UTC
You sound like a follower of Kant's deontology when you say other people can never be used as a means to an end. Of course, I agree with you. Any philosophy taken to an extreme can be dangerous. [LOL bullshitting.] I've been witness to extreme forms of deontology, nihilism, and cold scientific detachment. I won't shy away from admitting that I favor utilitarianism, but I do try to acknowledge its flaws, hence some of the difficult questions near the end.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

threadjack okay? royal_serge August 12 2010, 02:49:42 UTC
Pardon me sir, but ... a time machine?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

royal_serge August 12 2010, 03:11:52 UTC
Ah, please forgive my rudeness. I'm Constable Benton Fraser, RCMP. ... There's a story about how I first came to Chicago, but I suspect it's not really relevant here.

A TARDIS? ... Ah. I'm afraid my understanding of physics must need some brushing up.

Reply


Private. thegooddrjones August 12 2010, 03:29:42 UTC
Cute, Adrian. Very, very cute.

Reply

Private. triggered_it August 12 2010, 03:31:40 UTC
These are serious questions, Martha.

Reply

Private. thegooddrjones August 12 2010, 03:44:11 UTC
They're clearly intended to get a rise out of me in an effort to force an agreement that I simply don't feel. I'm waiting on word from the Admiral, and after I've read it, we'll discuss it again.

Reply

Private. triggered_it August 12 2010, 03:48:17 UTC
Please, I know you'll never agree with me. My goal was partly to annoy you, in which case I've been successful.

As for the rest of my motives? Well, I do get bored sometimes, Martha, and it's a subject that obviously interests me.

Reply


nodeedtoobase August 12 2010, 03:43:36 UTC
The goal of all human action should be social rectitude. This preoccupation with happiness and pleasure is a distraction from the needs of society, and serves only to blind people to the fact that true happiness is gained when the greater wrongs of the world have been righted.

Reply

triggered_it August 12 2010, 03:45:18 UTC
And what would you be willing to do in order to right the wrongs of the world? Kill five people, a hundred, a thousand, or even a million?

More, perhaps?

Reply

nodeedtoobase August 12 2010, 03:51:38 UTC
If the right man were to die in the right place at the right time, history would never be the same. I don't believe in excess. But I would do what was necessary.

What would you be willing to do?

Reply

triggered_it August 12 2010, 03:55:52 UTC
That would depend. If I was already directly involved in the situation, I would do what I could to save the greatest number of lives. However, if I was an observer, I would hesitate to directly involve myself if directly involving myself meant throwing an innocent person to the wolves.

Most people would say the same, if you are clever enough to tease it out of them. It seems the principle changes depending on the situation. [LOL, lies. he'd kill fifteen million people obvs.]

Reply


cautionarystory August 12 2010, 03:46:51 UTC
So, like, a lot of those depend on whether or not we care what's the right thing to do.

Reply

triggered_it August 12 2010, 03:49:13 UTC
Do you not?

Reply

cautionarystory August 12 2010, 04:10:11 UTC
Oh, sure I do. Construction worker, five schoolkids, somebody singing badly in the shower, I'm practically a nervous wreck about it all.

Reply

triggered_it August 12 2010, 04:12:29 UTC
They're hypotheticals. You're not meant to care, you're meant to think. Notice how principles change.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up