Welcome to our new arrivals. I mean that sincerely. The usual sarcasm is redundant at this point. The same comments are made every month, and it gets tiring to hear after a while. You'll learn for yourselves how this place operates soon enough.
To everyone else, I believe we're overdue for another flood. I suggest battening down the metaphorical
(
Read more... )
Comments 259
Ah, a philosophical discussion. How pleasant! But first, I have to note- your questions ... they rely rather heavily on the 'no win scenario', don't they?
Reply
As for the 'no win scenario' that's part of the point of utilitarianism and philosophy in general: to deduce a correct and logical answer from seemingly insoluble problems.
Sometimes sacrifices have to be made for the greater good but at what cost, and who is willing to make those sacrifices?
Reply
Ah, but in my experience, there is no such thing as a no-win scenario. There's always a third option. I've also discovered that the logical answer and the correct answer are not always the same thing.
As to your premise, of course sacrifices are sometimes necessary, but you can only chose whether or not to make sacrifices yourself. It's not right to chose to force others to make sacrifices.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
A TARDIS? ... Ah. I'm afraid my understanding of physics must need some brushing up.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
As for the rest of my motives? Well, I do get bored sometimes, Martha, and it's a subject that obviously interests me.
Reply
Reply
More, perhaps?
Reply
What would you be willing to do?
Reply
Most people would say the same, if you are clever enough to tease it out of them. It seems the principle changes depending on the situation. [LOL, lies. he'd kill fifteen million people obvs.]
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment