Wouldn't *that* have been lovely! (Then I'd be writing a paean of admiration instead of a polemic.) (I admit, I exaggerate for alliterative effect here. I doubt that really counted.)
I've seen "siteholder" in certain contexts, as in "a person with a legal right to use a physical site, but without a lease per se"--presumably a back-formation from "leaseholder."
Comments 17
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment