"Hypothetical" question

Mar 19, 2008 12:48

If one had to refer in an academic essay to the article of women's underwear which traditionally covers the bottom, how would one do so? I'm inclined towards 'knickers', but it doesn't sound very serious :-(

Time for a poll...

Poll The naming of pants

Leave a comment

Comments 25

venta March 19 2008, 13:59:38 UTC
There's something about the term "panties" that pisses me off quite irrationally. I've no idea why.

Reply

white_hart March 19 2008, 14:06:47 UTC
Me too. I think it's because it sounds like it's supposed to be 'cute'. I always think it comes across as hugely patronising.

Reply

bateleur March 19 2008, 14:40:48 UTC
I always think it comes across as hugely patronising.

It's OK, the panties don't mind.

Reply

smiorgan March 19 2008, 15:00:37 UTC
"Don't get your panties in a bind" being a prime example I guess

Reply


sosoclever March 19 2008, 15:27:29 UTC
If what you wear under your clothing is "underwear," and things like jackets and coats and snowpants are "outerwear," what are clothes? "Middlewear"? "Inbetweenwear"?

Reply

rosathome May 10 2008, 22:47:19 UTC
Wear?

Reply


killalla March 19 2008, 15:54:57 UTC
Some alternative terminology:

Modern: underwear, women's underwear
Period: foundation garments, lingerie
Archaic: drawers, bloomers, petticoat etc.

Reply

smiorgan March 19 2008, 17:07:01 UTC
I think you need a modern definition for a modern audience. I voted for "briefs", being specific to the part of anatomy they cover, unencumbered with different meanings between UK and US English and, well, boring. Which is what you want if you want to present something academic without the readers sniggering.

Reply


undyingking March 19 2008, 16:06:19 UTC
Why didn't I get to write essays about women's underwear when I was a student?

Reply

triskellian March 19 2008, 16:12:39 UTC
I dunno. Maybe you should have done more critical discourse analysis of articles like this?

Reply

undyingking March 19 2008, 16:36:01 UTC
FFS! I don't know which is worse, the article or the actuality it depicts.

Reply

triskellian March 19 2008, 16:48:51 UTC
I'm going with the actuality being worse, since the article at least has the small redeeming feature of providing a nice barrel, well stocked with fat fish for me to shoot ;-)

Reply


darkside_doris March 19 2008, 18:29:52 UTC
underpants seems too male I think.

knickers is a good one - as it sounds obviously female... but it does also have that sniggering effect!!

Good luck!! :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up