I was talking to a passenger a couple days ago, an out gay man, who had been walking a sign around...and he said his parent had been planning on voting for 8. It wasn't until he pointed out that a mere 12 years before he was born, they couldn't legally marry in California, until another activist California court decided on Brown vs. Lippold. My
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
You bet I'm in favour of same-sex marriages, and I too use the same analogy.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Well, I'm married. I'm not sure if/when they had same race restrictions in PA, but I never even thought of it. Hopefully, it'll be the same some day for same sex couples. I hope so!
Reply
Other states had laws that if applied as written would prevent anyone with a mixed background from marrying ANYONE at all.
Reply
Fun, those laws. I'm just glad that they're history!
Especially nowadays -- it seems like lots of people my age and younger are not marrying within race. I think it's hilarious that two girls I went to school with (same year) have married Asian (I think Chinese, but am not sure) men and now have kids that look less white than mine does. It just boggles my mind somehow.
Mixed race children are the future. ;-p
Then again, I just met a fairly big-shot prof who's half-Indian and half-English. And he's not young. So mixed race children are the past too. Never mind.
Reply
And in all of the fights I've had with her about it, I NEVER ONCE thought to remind her that the law would have prohibited her from marrying my dad if she had tried it 20 years sooner.
Shame, that.
It just amazes me that, not only was that battle won so recently, but also that this one is still being fought. Just... completely amazes.
Reply
Reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlItG4raicA
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment