Camera stuff: Online photo shares

May 05, 2007 14:15

So, I used to have a gallery instance on my website, before I moved to my own host hardware. I didn't bother migrating gallery, for whatever reason ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

dancingeek May 5 2007, 15:06:07 UTC
I use Flickr. Well, I use it when I have time to process stuff enough to upload it ;-) It's not only a good venue for hosting and managing galleries, but it can be a good resource of information.

Reply


octal May 5 2007, 15:09:32 UTC
I use flickr for the "community" aspect, search, etc.

I have uncommented "album" generated galleries of all my photos as they come off the cards, maintained on 5 disks kept rsynced, but I don't web publish the new ones, due to potential opsec issues with the photos. Plus I tend to bracket the hell out of whatever I shoot, so I have ~300 raw photos for every 1 that makes it to flickr.

I prefer static html for galleries like this, but I'd prefer better generation software, and probably some form of tagging. I really like the popularity tracking that flickr does, parsing exif, etc., so the current solution is good enough.

Reply


katlyn May 5 2007, 16:09:02 UTC
I use jalbum (http://jalbum.net/) to post galleries on my personal website. I'm sure there's something much better out there, but I tend to be far, far behind the "new software" curve no matter what it is.

I have a flickr account, never use it. Probably should, at some point.

Reply


parzanese May 8 2007, 01:10:46 UTC
heh, I still have and use a gallery account on mordred . . . what's that you say? change? nah, change is bad . . .

Reply


beguile_d May 9 2007, 12:09:33 UTC
Yes, yes, come use flickr!

I like how easy it is to use and I can make it a pseudo-journal. It's also just enough social-networking so that I feel like I'm part of a community.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up