(Untitled)

Jan 29, 2007 20:12

My dear readers ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 14

pr1ss January 30 2007, 10:56:40 UTC
I'd like to see Sylvia and Milton revived. I had some relatives (now deceased) with those names. They were born in the 1910 to 1920 era.

Now Christabel and Lysander just seem foofy.

How did Gideon get on your list of oddities? It just looks like an ordinary Biblical standard to me. Mark Twain remarked at how lucky it is that the short and easy to pronounce scriptural names are the ones that we still use. He pointed out that there could have been lots of little Nebuchadnezzar's running around.

Reply


medland January 30 2007, 11:22:33 UTC
Christabel - maybe
Mercy - maybe
Sylvia - no
Clare - no (this is a really common name in the UK)
Louisa - no
Rose - no (I plan to call my kid this, it's my gran's name)
Miriam - no
Helena - no

Julian - they might tease him for being camp but no.
Anselm - maybe
Crispin - in the UK yes
Gideon - no
Lysander - maybe - again with the campness
Dashiell - no I think it's a super name
Cassian - no
Florian (I think I know the answer to this one)
Milton (this one too)

Reply


medland January 30 2007, 11:24:01 UTC
So the yes/no is about whether or not they'd get their bums kicked.

Reply


landfill_sky January 30 2007, 12:15:27 UTC
All of those names are hot. Fully.
Especially Julian.

Reply


cosimo_oxhead January 30 2007, 15:06:11 UTC
The girls are fine. As for the boys, they are all pretty much bully fodder. Sorry.

Hell, if I met a 7-year-old Crispin I'd kick his ass!

Police officer: Why did you beat up that child, sir?

Me: Officer, his name is Crispin.

Police officer: I see your point. OK, you're free to go.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up