I just find it bizarre that there are loads of people out there, normally clever women: you, soph, potsherds, min, Nat, Ness etc etc etc (including myself) who can't quire figure out why we dislike it so much and how it can end up being about equality, or to illustrate how unfairly women are treated, or whatever.
Cos, subtext or no subtext, we just seem to be grasping at things and Scott Bakker just can't explain it to us. Or he says it's supposed to be in a certain way, but the text doesn't quite support it.
For what it is worth, I often find myself nodding in agreement with your posts.
Even if you hate picking at that scab and Scott is still hiding his rat. :p (Raticism? Ratism? Ratitis?)
Comments 11
Cos, subtext or no subtext, we just seem to be grasping at things and Scott Bakker just can't explain it to us. Or he says it's supposed to be in a certain way, but the text doesn't quite support it.
For what it is worth, I often find myself nodding in agreement with your posts.
Even if you hate picking at that scab and Scott is still hiding his rat. :p (Raticism? Ratism? Ratitis?)
Reply
Leave a comment