Workers self-defense

Sep 21, 2004 12:32

Goldman stated ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 13

djdialectic September 21 2004, 21:33:14 UTC
cannon in his defense says: "The court record bulges with proof that we had indeed advocated the organisation of workers defense guards."
bulges with proof? in regards the the battle of deputy run question, he doesn't even raise this. i have seen one or two mentions of organizing defense guards in the testimony--but he says the court record bulges with proof. what do you make of this? while it may seem like a petty point (and it could well be), it is representative of my larger criticism that cannon seems to vacillate or something that i can't put my finger on.

PS No worries on the lateness of your response.

Reply

advocating the organization of workers defense guards 1 ulyanovist September 21 2004, 22:43:36 UTC
Q: Then the theory of Marxists and the theory of the Socialist Workers Party, as far as violence is concerned, is a prediction based upon a study of history, is that right ( ... )

Reply

advocating the organization of workers defense guards 2 ulyanovist September 21 2004, 22:45:54 UTC
Party advocates workers defence guards ( ... )

Reply

advocating the organization of workers defense guards 3 ulyanovist September 21 2004, 22:49:33 UTC
Q: Did you ever hold a meeting where you spoke where workers’ defence guards protected the meeting ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up