Jeremiah and Umayer Chat-o-rama

[umayer]

LimbaughFan001: sup buddy

Comments

[umayer]

Sara,

I'm sorry about anything "bad" that Jeremiah said about you. He doesn't know you.

[twystidmynd]

"I'm sorry you lost a friend, Umayer."
Didn't you read? He didn't lose anything but a DM.

[twystidmynd]

My reply.

[twystidmynd]

This is jeremiah. If you didnt care about your ego, you would not be responding to my conversation with a commentary on everything that was said. You are so concerned about your ego that you took apart what was once a private conversation in an attempt to try and apply your irrational philosophy to it. If you didnt care so much about your ego, you would not have replied to Umayer and you would let it be. But instead you worry so much about your beautiful image that you try to disprove facts. You are a very very sad person and Im glad umayer no longer has to endure your foolishness

[twystidmynd]

You fail to make any point. You were a member of and Governor of, if I remember correctly, JSA. You should know how to form a decent argument however, you're falling far shorter than I would have predicted

Not surprised...

[inretrospekt]

Why does that always seem to be your reply to any argument? Instead of merely (if it's such a bad arguemnt) refuting it, instead you complain about how the argument is worthless. If the debate was so fucking stupid, you could EASILY win it, but instead you ignore the argument, and deem it always with weak points, or no points. Have you noticed that you ALWAYS do this? Every single time. Look back and at least notice you're not entitled to be elitist, nor are you the best debate candidate either.
If you're so much more intelligent (or plain old intelligent), then why don't you just simply refute the "ignorant" arguments and not just tell the person to "do better"?
When is an argument going to be good enough for you to participate in?