Slavery in Harry Potter

Mar 13, 2011 22:18

Over on FaceBook, leswamp posted, "One of the most interesting things about facebook is the posts that garner huge reactions and the ones that don't. IME any post that mentions Harry Potter or religion or the civil war is a sure fire billion comments. I know! What side would Harry Potter take on the civil war and does Wizard count as a religion ( Read more... )

criticism, snark, harry potter

Leave a comment

Comments 21

slashpervert March 14 2011, 05:53:00 UTC
Damn, you're funny and billiant! But you know that.

Reply


sheta_kaey March 14 2011, 08:17:37 UTC
Leswamp? Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Reply


sheta_kaey March 14 2011, 08:21:46 UTC
What's your FB link?

Reply

uncledark March 14 2011, 17:05:09 UTC

dreamervictoria March 14 2011, 12:12:02 UTC
At best, he thinks it's vaguely bad, but the only time he ever acts in a way contrary to the enslavement of house elves, he does so purely to spite his personal enemy.

In fairness, a similar thing could be said of Lincoln.

Reply

uncledark March 14 2011, 17:08:37 UTC
True. Contextually, though, there's a significant difference between a political figure of 150 years ago and a children's book series written in 15 years ago. Especially given that the former was primarily concerned with the compromises needed to hold a nation together, and the latter is concerned with a morality tale about the value of love and friendship.

Reply


elfwreck March 14 2011, 15:01:53 UTC
And now I'm trying to figure out if clothing would have improved or damaged this post.

... don't tell me. "Trying to figure out" is not the same as "want to know."

The whole wizarding world is caught up in roughly Victorian-era morality, maintained by xenophobia and inertia. And I want someone to write the epilogue-era fic where that comes crashing down around them, because Muggle tech has finally superseded a lot of magic abilities. Wrist-based hologram computers, instant planetwide web access, house-cleaning robots, programmable search-and-[whatever] flying bots--about the only thing we're not on the verge of is the "bigger on the inside" tents. And brooms, maybe, but I suspect that's more a safety issue than a tech one.

Heh. Maybe someone with a squib child decides to make them "as good as any wizard," or hide their squib nature entirely, by loading them up with the right tech.

Reply

uncledark March 14 2011, 17:11:49 UTC
I suddenly have an image of Iron Mage, a squib fitted out in high-tech armor that simulates wizardry...

Technomages ahoy!

And, for the record, I was only naked because I'd just gotten up from a nap. I don't strip to write about Harry Potter.

Reply

pure_agnostic March 15 2011, 05:12:29 UTC
Our technology is insufficiently advanced since it is still distinguishable from magic. (i.e. - There is a big difference between a flying broom and a personal jetpack, even though a flying car is equivalent to an airplane.)

Excuse me for a moment while I go feed my pet dementor.

Reply

uncledark March 15 2011, 05:14:44 UTC
Sufficiently crude magic is indistinguishable from technology.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up