Comments | unmaker: Would you still sue?

unmaker

Would you still sue?

Oct 03, 2004 00:03

Let's say you step on a nail. Ouch. You go to the doctor, the doctor takes a look at the wound and explains that - uhoh - the wound is gangrenous. Simply pulling out the nail isn't enough - either your foot is amputated or you risk losing the whole leg. Terrified, you agree to this drastic procedure, trusting the wisdom of your physician. Three ( Read more... )

Comments 4

HAHA! threonine October 3 2004, 14:14:07 UTC

Oh man, that was wonderful.

Re: HAHA! unmaker October 4 2004, 15:21:07 UTC

Thank you. :-)

1918underwood October 3 2004, 18:28:50 UTC

Actually, the gangrene wasn't really the reason for amputating your foot, it was to remove the terrible nail. That was clear from the very beginning.

unmaker October 4 2004, 15:21:56 UTC

Removing the foot being the only logical way of dealing with the nail. Of course. :-)