Livejournal
Log in
Post
Friends
My journal
urbanrebel
Which city?
Aug 11, 2009 13:32
Which would be your choice if you were single and slutty and based your decision only on this? LOL
(
Read more...
)
Leave a comment
Comments 20
Next
yep_i_am_dennis
August 11 2009, 21:01:09 UTC
LMFAO!
Reply
urbanrebel
August 11 2009, 21:05:26 UTC
That's NOT an answer, Dennis! (Stomps foot). LOL
Reply
yep_i_am_dennis
August 11 2009, 22:14:44 UTC
Then I pick Boston!
Reply
thespos
August 11 2009, 21:13:13 UTC
I don't know which is better... a glut of tops, or a glut of bottoms.
It's the choice between having a harem or being a part of one. :-D
Reply
urbanrebel
August 11 2009, 21:15:15 UTC
Why is NOBODY answering the question?!?! Geesh! ha!
Reply
thespos
August 11 2009, 21:26:39 UTC
Because we need more options!
I'll put it this way - I'm not going near Houston.
Reply
urbanrebel
August 11 2009, 21:42:38 UTC
LOL. Got it. ;-)
Reply
Thread 7
toast3r
August 11 2009, 21:33:39 UTC
Houston is 70% bottom? REALLY?
Oh, and to answer your question if I had to pick based on this graph: Seattle. And because Seattle is pretty.
What's interesting about this graph is that the cities with more tops are generally considered the more "aggressive" cities.
Reply
urbanrebel
August 11 2009, 21:41:43 UTC
You broke the rules, Ryan. I said if you could ONLY base your decision on the graph. So pretty has nothing to do with it. ;-)
Reply
toast3r
August 11 2009, 22:03:39 UTC
Well, based on the graph alone, I would pick Chicago. It's a nice healthy mix of tops and bottoms.
Granted, even though I like both, if I can't have either, they can at least have each other.
Reply
urbanrebel
August 11 2009, 22:11:13 UTC
Fair enough. :-)
Reply
markormarky
August 12 2009, 01:03:08 UTC
heh - i assume YOU did the research required to put this poll together.
i'd live in Paris, France ;-P (no joke tho! otherwise, where i am :-) )
Reply
urbanrebel
August 12 2009, 16:04:00 UTC
Yes, I did ALL the research personally . . . and man am I exhausted from all that sex! :-p
Paris wasn't on the list, but I think I'd go with you. We could be roomies. ;-)
Reply
adrianaendless
August 12 2009, 16:26:00 UTC
You are too funny sometimes! :)
Reply
urbanrebel
August 12 2009, 16:59:32 UTC
Hey there, stranger! I hope you, the hubby and horses are doing well.
Reply
Next
Leave a comment
Up
Comments 20
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's the choice between having a harem or being a part of one. :-D
Reply
Reply
I'll put it this way - I'm not going near Houston.
Reply
Reply
Oh, and to answer your question if I had to pick based on this graph: Seattle. And because Seattle is pretty.
What's interesting about this graph is that the cities with more tops are generally considered the more "aggressive" cities.
Reply
Reply
Granted, even though I like both, if I can't have either, they can at least have each other.
Reply
Reply
i'd live in Paris, France ;-P (no joke tho! otherwise, where i am :-) )
Reply
Paris wasn't on the list, but I think I'd go with you. We could be roomies. ;-)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment