One of the anti-recruitment kicking points is the high percentage of homeless people who are veterans. I am of the opinion, they are drawing the wrong conclusion from this correlation. Let me tell you why and ask your opinions on the issue
(
Read more... )
Comments 37
How does the percentage of veterans compare to the percentage of non-veterans of the same social/racial/economic background? What about the percentage of non-homeless veterans compared to the percentage of non-homeless non-veterans of the same social/racial/economic background? And what specifically is the definition of homeless? Is someone who can't afford a place of their own and lives with relatives or friends included among homeless numbers? What about people housed by the state? Does it include migrant workers? Is it broken down by state and state of origin?
And regarding veterans from the 1960s through the 1970s, when drugs and alcohol were more permissive--when calculating homeless percentages for a given age group from similar prior-service backgrounds, how are prison populations figured in?
Reply
I mean, you could do a simple count or try to match people--veterans and non--by SES, age, and ethnic origin.
I also think an operational definition of homeless would also be required, but I'm pretty sure a broad definition would require someone without a current, fixed residence within a permanent structure.
Reply
You're ignorance to those who are suffering shows your inability to empathize with others - I believe you are a bourgeois sociopath.
Reply
Reply
Where I think you might see a difference is if you looked at Rural homelessness, or looking at the numbers as "the skills you picked up could keep a person just functional enough as a homeless person to avoid institutionalization" (mental hospital, jails, hospitals.. or the morgue).
Reply
Leave a comment