Hopefully this will be the kind of guerrilla journalism being talked about and not spin/incompetence under the pretense of anonymity and rhetoric.
The reusing of Chevron, does, however, carry baggage and indications of slant. I am not yet sure whether this is a good, bad, or purposeful thing. Looking forward to finding out.
Hopefully this will be the kind of guerrilla journalism being talked about and not spin/incompetence under the pretense of anonymity and rhetoric
Publishers of the original Chevron had the conviction to add their name to their work. Anonymity does not imbue the publication with a sense of credibility.
someone told me about this and in passing it sounded like the most juvenile thing possible. having actually seen it, A+ for effort and intent, A- because it's just ok. Issue 2's whole how to get into tunnel has such a "we're just trying to recklessly annoy people" vibe than anything else, though.
You know, a lot of people currently at Imprint suspect I'm behind The Chevron somehow, which you absolutely know isn't true. Personally, if it were me, I would have chosen the name Coryphaeus instead.
Comments 6
The reusing of Chevron, does, however, carry baggage and indications of slant. I am not yet sure whether this is a good, bad, or purposeful thing. Looking forward to finding out.
Reply
Publishers of the original Chevron had the conviction to add their name to their work. Anonymity does not imbue the publication with a sense of credibility.
Reply
Reply
You know, a lot of people currently at Imprint suspect I'm behind The Chevron somehow, which you absolutely know isn't true. Personally, if it were me, I would have chosen the name Coryphaeus instead.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment