Interview Series 2011: Gianduja Kiss

Oct 20, 2011 04:27

Until the 25th I'll be posting the results of the Interview Series, with a different vidder featured every second night. All questions posed to the vidders were submitted by you, the members of the community; and though several questions were addressed to all vidders taking part, there are a few specific to each individual vidder as well ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 21

giandujakiss October 20 2011, 10:47:02 UTC
Oh gosh, there's no need to apologize to me! I'm just so incredibly grateful and flattered that you took the time to do this, and to select such pretty frames from my vids - thank you!

Reply


such_heights October 20 2011, 10:58:25 UTC
I really enjoyed this, thanks so much for sharing! *sits here quietly fangirling* :D

Reply

giandujakiss October 20 2011, 13:44:23 UTC
Hee, thank you! I'm glad you liked it!

Reply


astartexx October 20 2011, 18:21:41 UTC
Fascinating read, especially the differences in approaching vidding were intriguing - and a lot of food for thoughts.

I have one question regarding the scrap timelines, we did talk about it once and I tried it, but I find it difficult to keep mentally track of them. It sounds so straightforward in theory, but it throws me in practice. Maybe it's just the way my brain is wired when I edit, but it's easier for me to work with one timeline, pull random clips on it and arrange them on different layers, then separate timelines. I suppose you only cut clips down on the scrap timelines, nothing else, right? So my question would be, how do you merge the clips down in your project timeline without losing focus of one of them?

Reply

giandujakiss October 20 2011, 18:40:17 UTC
I remember talking about the scrap timelines! Sorry they didn't work for you :-).

I think the reason it works for me is that after a bit of batting clips around and staring at the computer and hitting things, I tend to settle on a structure for the vid - I get pretty clear that different sections will have different types of images. Like, Too Darn Hot is a simple example - the vid is divided into sections based on alternate meanings of the word "hot." Once I've done that, I know for any particular vid section that I need to look at timelines A, B, and C, and then I just review those timelines (over and over, sometimes), pluck out the clips I like best, see how they work in the actual vid, repeat, until I'm satisfied.

Reply

astartexx October 20 2011, 19:06:15 UTC
I need to retry that approach - otherwise my next project gets too overblown and complicated without me even editing. I started pulling clips and the neat order of scrap timelines appeals to me now more than ever.

Reply

giandujakiss October 20 2011, 19:07:58 UTC
I think it works best when you have a clear idea of the overall structure of your vid, what you're basically going for in different sections? So you know what sorts of timelines to create in the first place.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

giandujakiss October 20 2011, 19:20:03 UTC
Hi there! And yes, they chose the songs for those vids, and Destina chose the song for Blaze of Glory. In all of those cases, their idea was tied to the song - and for all of them, I could see it right away - there wasn't any kind of issue of negotiation because it clicked for me, perfectly. Thuvia had the most well-developed concept - she had some specific lyric matches, and a lot of the structure (like, the Dana focus in the final verse), as well as a very developed political thesis. RivkaT just pointed me at songs and the concept was clear right away. Destina had the idea for switching between Sam and Dean's POV and a couple of suggested lyric matches. But in all of those cases, none of this was an issue for me because I was basically on board with their concepts from the beginning ( ... )

Reply


counteragent October 20 2011, 19:22:05 UTC
<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
PS Those are hearts, not little penises.

Reply

giandujakiss October 20 2011, 19:33:33 UTC
Either way is fine :-). Thanks - glad you liked!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up