More trans-confusion

Mar 27, 2008 14:59

Here is a brand new story from the Advocate about a legally transgendered man who is now having a baby. WHAT?? Yeah, all I have to say is I think the guy is a little confused about whether or not he really wants to be a man or a woman. And secondly, it can't be good for your body to go on and off of T like this. I first heard about it on Feast of ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 12

soma_nightmare March 27 2008, 19:31:10 UTC
and what about the baby!

Reply

shawnaree March 27 2008, 19:57:03 UTC
The fact that he chose to have a child doesn't bother me at all. His wife couldn't, due to her hysterectomy, and besides that, I know a significant number of transmen who, like male-assigned-at-birth men, feel the pull to have children in their lives that are theirs, biologically. Trans guys freeze their eggs, etc., for this reason all the time ( ... )

Reply

vixenvixen March 27 2008, 21:31:00 UTC
I don't believe I am transphobic at all. I think everyone has the right to be whoever or whatever they want. My "confusion" or misunderstanding comes into identity. This particular guy is unhappy that people are completely bewildered by a "pregnant man." This guy is living as a legal man, with his legal wife, in a legal heterosexual situation. But ALSO wants the biological rights of a woman. His neighbors, coworkers, etc recognize him as a man..because this is what he has been portraying... and then he gets upset with these people when he physically expresses that he can also bear children. You can't honestly be upset that people, including doctors, are a little questioning of this. I quite frankly don't give a shit what people do with their lives, who they fuck, or what orifice they are fucking, but when someone portrays him/herself as one thing (a man in this case), they don't have much room to be knitpicky about people's reactions when they decide to attempt something that is conceptually inconceivable (being a pregnant man). What ( ... )

Reply

shawnaree March 28 2008, 00:08:35 UTC
Well, I'm sure they'll tell their kids exactly what they're telling us-- his wife is their mother, and he is their father.

Bearing a child does not a woman make. I think that's where we have differences in opinion. There are a lot of men I know who have given birth to children, before transition. This just takes more thought.

And... I think I would be unhappy too, if everyone around me was trying to force their morals on my body. Obviously, you can be a pregnant man, since he is a man, with a uterus, who has decided to use it. "You can't be pregnant because you're a man" is just as elitist in my opinion as "You have to shave your legs, you're a woman."

Reply


vixenvixen March 27 2008, 19:46:31 UTC
Here's what one of the podcast listeners had to say about it ( ... )

Reply


shawnaree March 28 2008, 03:46:55 UTC
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=4536604&page=1 For you, an article about a man who wrote a book for his daughter, explaining that he is transitioning... it's kinda cute. *shrug*

Reply

shawnaree March 28 2008, 03:58:06 UTC
http://community.livejournal.com/free_speech_ftm/88324.html <--also, some of the discussion that has been happening in the trans communities that I belong to. Some are against it, some are for it, and a good deal seem to just been worried about what this will mean for trans people everywhere... does this mean that I won't be able to change my gender marker, for instance, because I can't afford a hysto, even though I don't plan on using my uterus?

Stuff like that. Anyway, you might be interested in the discourse within a sample of the trans community.

Here's a followup too, once everyone decided the malepregnancy link was a hoax.

This story has implications beyond this one guy, and that's really scary for me.

Reply


vixenvixen March 28 2008, 12:44:47 UTC
Ok, here is another post from the website where I heard about this news item. I am not saying I agree with everything she says, but it better reflects some of what I was trying to say. I particularly agree with the part about working so hard to be accepted... That gender is all or nothing, I'm not sure. Yes you have to be male or female as a legal citizen, and there is no identification of a third gender, but there are androgynous people who don't want to be labeled ( ... )

Reply


vixenvixen March 28 2008, 18:13:22 UTC
This is an interesting way of looking at trans. I don't know where this definition originated, but if it is accurate then...well, then I'm not sure what ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up