seems like the reviewer just didn't get what this is all about... But anyway, that was not a cool show. I mean, excerpt for some friends, ther was virtually no audience... We"ll, anyway.
Even though the review was bitchy you still got a good score. I guess the reviewer would have preferred it if you'd been James fucking Blunt. The review site is called 'ChartAttack' which seems to indicate they have a preference for shite mainstream chart music and looking through their previous reviews (Supergrass, The Arctic Monkeys, Belle and Sebbastian, The Cardigans) it looks like they are used to reviewing bland, sensible 4-piece acts which appeal to conformist students...
Ah well, you still had a good rate, the critic just didn't want originality! ;) I'm sorry he's such an ass about everything you do differently, heh, some people are like that! He must envy you guys. ;)
One thing though... I never got the "losing the pants" thing either, maybe it's a French thing! :p
Comments 19
The review site is called 'ChartAttack' which seems to indicate they have a preference for shite mainstream chart music and looking through their previous reviews (Supergrass, The Arctic Monkeys, Belle and Sebbastian, The Cardigans) it looks like they are used to reviewing bland, sensible 4-piece acts which appeal to conformist students...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Jackass alert!
He must like boring folk music where people don't do anything on stage.
Reply
Reply
Was he expecting perhaps.. Jewel?
Whoopsies :D
Reply
Reply
One thing though... I never got the "losing the pants" thing either, maybe it's a French thing! :p
You guys are great, don't doubt it! :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment