(Untitled)

Jan 04, 2006 08:34

Ah, the Post, batting 1.000 as usual. They sure like to play the odds with completely unfounded rumors. Perhaps someday they'll resemble an actual newspaper.


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 6

zesty_pinto January 4 2006, 06:02:47 UTC
Honestly, who actually believes "The Post" anyway? Most of the people that do don't resemble the highest intellectuals in the metropolitan area.

Reply

warren8472 January 4 2006, 06:29:15 UTC
You mean Gephardt wasn't on the Democratic ticket last year?


... )

Reply

zesty_pinto January 4 2006, 06:39:41 UTC
I still remember when there was that issue of an American terrorist and discussions on what to do with them. Most papers gave the same question on what to do with them, but "The Post" more or less summed up their point on page 1: "IF IT SMELLS LIKE A RAT."

Every press agency has their own bias, sure, but it catches you off-guard when you see that sort of thing put smackdab on page 1 for everyone to see.

Reply

warren8472 January 4 2006, 06:53:47 UTC
"The Post" more or less summed up their point on page 1: "IF IT SMELLS LIKE A RAT."

So... they proposed that he be allowed to breed unfettered in the subway? Ah, the Post; their inability to keep their clichés straight is almost a cliché in and of itself.

Reply


columbasimplex January 4 2006, 07:38:26 UTC
In fairness, this morning's USA Today ran with a banner headline about the 12 survivors, too. Not that it's such a paragon of journalistic merit, but at least it's not owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up