(Untitled)

Nov 29, 2006 19:11

Sunday’s New York Times:


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

onelargecat November 30 2006, 00:43:20 UTC
UGH!

Reply

scarlete November 30 2006, 00:57:02 UTC
on many levels

Reply


geekette8 November 30 2006, 09:49:43 UTC
/me doesn't understand...

Reply

webhill November 30 2006, 11:43:18 UTC
There is a major error in the text...

Reply

geekette8 November 30 2006, 13:11:00 UTC
And *this* is why I am not a proof-reader. I'm very good at reading what is supposed to be there rather than what is actually there! I had to read that about a dozen times, including scrutinising each bit really carefully, before I caught it.

Reply


tdcsnowwhite November 30 2006, 10:35:07 UTC
In my local paper, I'd expect it, but in the NYT?

That reminds me of yesterday's daily announcements at school (we have to print a copy of the announcements and post them in our room each day). There was a message from guidance that said, "If any student was planning on applying to Seton Hall, they can apply on-line by December 1, and the application fee will be waved." I went on a 5 minute rant about how people who work in a school should be able to spell the word 'waived.'

Reply

webhill November 30 2006, 11:45:36 UTC
How about the non-matching tenses, and the easily avoided and possibly confusing singular they? I'm not thrilled. I'd have said "Any student planning to apply to Seton Hall may apply on-line before December 1, and the application fee will be waived." But that's just your friendly local animal doctor talking :)

Reply


kerinda November 30 2006, 16:14:24 UTC
Ugh. Grunt.

There, communication on a level they can understand.

Reply


poetpaladin December 8 2006, 03:40:52 UTC
Ahahahahahahah!

Goes to tell you, spellcheck in software can only guarantee accurate spelling, not accurate wording.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up