(Untitled)
so i've never really been big on current events. i don't watch the news or read the paper, and i never talk to my family so i don't really know whats going on. i only knew about the tsunami like a week after it happend, when sam tulliver was voicing his concern for chandler being in sri lanka. was thinking about this the other day, and decided to ( Read more... )
Comments 4
Anyway, i disagree with you on the journalist keeping her sources private. If she were serious about keeping her position as a journalist in high esteem, she shouldn't have facilited a crime by helping some corrupt higher-up (possibly Rove) reveal the name of a CIA operative, endangering her and her contacts, for petty revenge. In Watergate, Deepthroats identity was kept secret because he was a wistle-blower for government corruption, but this journalists' source is an instigator of government corruption.
Reply
i just do not like snitches.
if i was a journalist, i would do anything i could to get a good story.
and, im so retarded in current events that i don't know much about deepthroat, i just know that i liked the name, and that he had to do with watergate.
but, im better at english.
it's *whistle.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment