So, Jamie Foxx got the Oscar for best actor the other night. That's a good call, in my opinion. Shit, it's one of the most accurate performances ever. To the extent that I've had genuinely cliched conversations along the lines of "Shit, he really looks and sounds just like Ray Charles" with responses like "...you mean that WASN'T Ray Charles
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
And yes, Shawnee Smith didn't get *nearly* enough screentime, though I'm sure I would still hate this film regardless.
Reply
It was done on a pretty shoestring budget... and it shows. But for what it was, I liked it a lot. But the group I watched it with were quite divided. Saw 2 is on its way now, and unfortunately, I think I can pretty comfortably say that that one is going to undoubtedly suck.
***SPOILERS, should anyone else be reading this***
I didn't spot any plot holes that couldn't be explained. The only thing about it all that I found really implausible was that a terminally ill old guy could overpower all those people so easily.
***END SPOILERS***
Either way, this was a movie that overflowed with potential. It could of been a much better movie, had it had a sharper script and better actors... but you could say that about anything.
Reply
fucked up movie.
bruce campbell should really be in everything, so it's almost a waste of time to mention that he should be in something. that's like waking up in the morning and thinking "i should really do some breathing today."
Reply
Still, I generally welcome sequels. The original remains, and nothing can change that.
You're right. But really, Bruce would make any movie better, it's a fact. I might even have vaguely expressed an interest in seeing one of those shitty-looking Jude Law films if Jude Law were actually Bruce Campbell.
Reply
Leave a comment