Philosophy 2010

Aug 16, 2009 21:41

This is for anyone applying to Philosophy graduate programs during the 2009-2010 academic year. Please share acceptances, rejections, wait-list notifications, and so on.

Best of luck to everyone applying!

Leave a comment

Comments 7263

anonymous August 23 2009, 23:18:10 UTC
WOOHOO!!!!!!!!

Reply

anonymous August 25 2009, 07:49:59 UTC
In case anyone happened upon this thread before it was rebooted, I just wanted to let everyone know that this is THE place to be for philosophy phd app season. Rest assured, things will pick up soon, its still fairly early.

Tradition has it that prospective forum frequenters create an introduction piece detailing their academic profile and a list of their targeted schools. ive decided to wait a year to apply, so I wont be giving my personal intro just yet, but I just wanted to encourage people to start sharing.

Good luck everyone!

Reply

anonymous August 30 2009, 01:24:22 UTC
Did I miss something? Wasn't there another philosophy thread? What happened to that one?

Reply

anonymous August 30 2009, 17:21:26 UTC
shh, we don't talk about the Other Thread.

Reply


anyone want to take over responsibility for philprospectives? plnphilosopher September 3 2009, 20:04:03 UTC
Hello all,

I was an applicant last year, and I started a private board called philprospectives for those people who got into places or were wait listed. Making it private eliminated trolls and allowed people to speak more openly. It also facilitated contacting people considering the same schools. As far as I know from the people I've met who were using it actively, the board helped people make a more informed decision.

Anyway, I'm done (thankfully) with admissions forever and would thus like to pass administrative duties for philprospectives to someone else. If you'd like to do it, then please contact me via private message. Thanks and good luck!

Reply

Re: anyone want to take over responsibility for philprospectives? plnphilosopher September 8 2009, 00:44:11 UTC
I'd like to come out in support of the philp board as a useful addition to wgi. It helped me make my decision last year.

Reply


anonymous September 4 2009, 07:58:07 UTC
Hello!

You all ready for this?!

Just found the site tonight, been doing a lot of reading from '09 and '08. Feeling anxious, but pumped.

I'll come back with an intro once I choose a handle.

Good luck everyone!

Reply

Okay so here goes sci_phi2010 September 5 2009, 00:48:37 UTC
I'm not quite done narrowing down the institutions to which I'd like to apply, but generally speaking my interests are in HPS.

Right now I'm at the stage where I'm picking out a writing sample in order to begin polishing, I have three professors who will offer me strong recommendations (though I may reconsider one or two of them since they are not philosophy faculty) and I still haven't taken the GRE.

I hope this community turns out to be as useful this time around as it seems to have been in the past!

Reply

Re: Okay so here goes anonymous September 5 2009, 13:24:20 UTC
You definitely want *at least* two letters from philosophy faculty, even as a self-declared HPS guy. But I think 4 letters total would be fine for most places, so just add a philosopher to the mix.

Reply

Re: Okay so here goes anonymous September 8 2009, 14:26:15 UTC
I agree. Even HPS faculty are primarily *philosophers* so you need to show them that you can do philosophy. One way to do this is by having letters from philosophers. That said, it's not going to hurt to have letters from non-philosophers, provide that the non-philosophers are working in the sciences. Of course, a lot of this depends on the identities of your letter writers. If you non-philosopher recommendation is from Marc Hauser, then that recommendation would go farther at an HPS dept than a no-name philosopher...

Reply


anonymous September 9 2009, 23:40:55 UTC
I must say, the process of looking through every professor's publication list is really making me despise "cute" article titles and value the plain, headline style titles.

Reply

anonymous September 10 2009, 00:59:01 UTC
Well, maybe if you actually read the articles, you'll find they're quite "cute" after all...

Reply

anonymous September 10 2009, 01:11:59 UTC
Of course I read them: I want to know what they're about. The problem with "cute" titles is that you often need to read the article in order to know if you'd be interested in reading it! It's silly, but not that problematic.

Reply


Naturalistic Oriented Philosophy Departments anonymous September 16 2009, 22:12:40 UTC
Which philosophy departments do you consider to be the most naturalistically oriented? I'm interested in hearing your thoughts. To give you an example of a department that I think to be naturalistically oriented: Rutgers.

Reply

Re: Naturalistic Oriented Philosophy Departments anonymous September 16 2009, 22:34:21 UTC
Definitely Pitt HPS would fit into this category.

Reply

Re: Naturalistic Oriented Philosophy Departments anonymous September 18 2009, 13:48:07 UTC
U of Maryland

Reply


Leave a comment

Up