Re: I know i heardwhtgandalf16June 13 2005, 23:57:42 UTC
Yes, like in the OJ trial the prosecution failed to proove without a shadow of a doubt that he did do it. That is necessary and the testimony of the child was so inconsistent it wasn't even funny.
Why? The prosecution failed to proove without a shadow of a doubt that he did do it. That is necessary and the testimony of the child was so inconsistent it wasn't even funny.
Comments 8
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
OJ had motive, was there at the scene of the crime, and had the victim's blood on his glove.
Robert Blake's alibi was that he was going back into the restaurant to grab his gun.
There was a videotape of Rodney King being beaten by the police.
There was a videotape of the Rodney King incident rioters beating another man.
If you are going to do a crime, do it in fucking California. The juries don't prosecute for shit.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment