Leave a comment

Comments 4

(The comment has been removed)

willtruncheon September 13 2006, 19:16:43 UTC
Well, there's sure a prescedent for the White House "retiring" officers who insist on holding reality-based opinions that conflict with the administration's party line. Just ask General Shinskei, who got canned soon after he said several hundred thousand troops would be required to conduct the war properly.

Interesting article here, that seems to imply it's not just a few retired boobs who think Rumsfeld has catastophically screwed the pooch.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/23/washington/23military.html?ei=5090&en=e80c4d98b9bfddc9&ex=1303444800&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all

Reply

abce September 25 2006, 18:00:48 UTC
General Shinseki served the entirety of his four year term as Chief of Staff of the Army. You are confusing things which occur in temporal proximity for causation.

Reply

willtruncheon September 26 2006, 02:36:10 UTC
Not really, no. Rumsfeld announced Shinseki's retirement... 14 months before it was scheduled. Thereby lame-ducking Shinseki, immediately after Shinseki's reality-based estimates of required troop strengths in Iraq. Check your chronology.

Need I point out, in addition, that Shinseki was absolutely correct? And Rumsfeld's head is still deeply inserted into his ass?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up