well, the article says it can get 500 miles on a single tank of gas, so assuming maybe a 20 gallon tank which is pretty standard for a lot of light aircraft, 25MPG?
So then it would require more gas than my car, which sucks. I wonder how fast it can go. If it goes faster, it might be worth it, at least until they come out with the hybrid version. *grin*
Yeah, we all want the flying car, but you know that as soon as they became mass available, the dipshits would be the ones do buy them up, en masse. And really, do we really want a bunch of bass thumping wannabe's directing their subwoofers down at us from 50 feet up?
I like the Skycar better. Vertical takeoffs and landings are WAY preferable to needing runways. And it looks like a Batmobile. Best of all, 900 miles on a tank of fuel gets me to NoVA without stopping in Jersey!
Not yet, and when they start, they'll be a million; but with luck and a forward-thinking "how do we start making money again" auto manufacturer, they could drop to $60,000. But the redundant engines and VTOL capability totally trump the Transition and its runways. What I'd really like to see is the Skycar with better overland ability -- something I could drive as a car, then take off vertically when traffic gets thick or an accident blocks the road, so I wouldn't have to burn the extra fuel in flight, unnecessarily. Places like DC and Norfolk would get pretty antsy about their restricted airspace with these things around, though ...
Comments 9
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I like the Skycar better. Vertical takeoffs and landings are WAY preferable to needing runways. And it looks like a Batmobile. Best of all, 900 miles on a tank of fuel gets me to NoVA without stopping in Jersey!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment