A mortgage adviser wanted to know our disposable income. We weren't sure how to answer, and the more we tried to drill down into what he meant by it, the more confusing it got. The concept seems to rely on two assumptions, both of which I disagree with: 1) that there's a clear binary division between needs and wants, and 2) that this corresponds to
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
Reply
Reply
Reply
Even just being in a different place would affect your fuel consumption to and from work, which will mount up even if it's just a tiny amount.
So a large element is just going to be guesswork anyway.
Reply
I work from home (even in non-Covid times) and Alex cycles to work, so the fuel thing shouldn't matter even if we were moving (unless we moved too far away to cycle, but we'd be extremely unlikely to do that).
But it's definitely a huge amount of guesswork. The utility company increasing the prices, or an unusually cold or mild winter, or getting a new energy-efficient washing machine or tumble dryer, would probably make more difference to utility bills than the moving-related changes you suggest.
And any of those changes are still smaller than the changes we could make by cutting down on discretionary spending (disposable income in your and my sense but not the mortgage adviser's sense).
Reply
But it didn't seem to be what the mortgage adviser meant by it. He explicitly said all our direct debits and standing orders (including regular charitable giving, kids' activities, subscriptions, any regular transfers to savings, etc) should be subtracted from our income when calculating it. Hence my confusion about what he meant by "disposable income", because it's *not* the same as what I understood it to mean, and doesn't seem to be a coherent concept.
When I used terms like "discretionary" I was trying to highlight this disconnect between my understanding and the adviser's.
Reply
Then again, we entered the housing market quite a bit earlier than most people we know, and were probably in the hand-mouth situation you describe. (We discovered a great deal of fun novel information at the time, such as the fact that the bank wasn't allowed to give us a mortgage that left us less than 60% of our total income for bills and necessities, but e.g. having tap water wasn't a necessity. It was a different era.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
It seemed to be more like "without cutting back on anything you're currently spending."
But, I think, by definition, if you're taking on any new financial commitment, you have to do less of whatever you're currently doing with your money, even if that's just sticking it in an ISA.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment