Part 11

Jun 09, 2012 22:35


Part 1 |  Part 2 Part 3 |  Part 4 |  Part 5 |  Part 6 |  Part 7 |  Part 8 |  Part 9 |  Part 10

Feel free to reprompt posts from previous parts once. If you do so, I'd recommend leaving a link to your fill on the original prompt, in case somebody is tracking the first thread.

Please note that you can still fill over at parts one and two- just don't prompt ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

FILL: Pharos 1/? anonymous May 4 2013, 06:07:49 UTC
A/N The title is an allusion to the Lighthouse of Alexandria. I hope the OP won't mind, but I want Lex's full name in this to be Alexandria. The ancient city is famous for two sources of light: the lighthouse, which was one of the Wonders of the World and which was one of the tallest man-made structures for many centuries, and the great library. The city was built by Alexander ( ... )

Reply

FILL: Pharos 2/? anonymous May 4 2013, 06:09:55 UTC
It was all over the news ( ... )

Reply

FILL: Pharos 3/? anonymous May 4 2013, 06:51:55 UTC
She paid the replacement fee for the jacket. It was a simple thoughtless gesture.

She had thought Kent might send her a thank-you note.

She hadn’t expected him to show up at her office to try and pay her back. She really hadn’t expected him to actually make it past Mercy into her office.

“I really have to pay you back,” he pleaded, almost begged.

She looked at her watch.

“You really came all this way, just to pay me back because I paid for the tuxedo I ruined ( ... )

Reply

FILL: Pharos 4/? Trigger: Dubcon (Fraud and mind-altering substances) anonymous May 4 2013, 06:57:16 UTC
Clark sat back and took in the view from her dining room ( ... )

Reply

OP x_stacie May 4 2013, 10:40:39 UTC
Aww, that last sentence killed me. I felt so bad for Alexandria. She tried so hard to win over Clark and it looks like to her that the alien was only stringing her along.

I'll love to see her reaction when she realizes this encounter have left her a little gift.

Reply

Re: OP anonymous May 4 2013, 17:14:10 UTC
Wait and see... wait and see...

Actually, it was not originally my intention for this particular encounter to result in Conner... I'm going back and forth on the question now though, because this scenario allows characters to stay relatively faultless, which depending on the tone I want the story to take might be exactly where I want the characters. Lex gets to feel vulnerable and betrayed, but Clark still gets to be the all-American boy scout whose ill-thought-out daliance wasn't really his fault. On the other hand, I can't imagine that Lex Luthor wouldn't have taken protective measures, if you know what I mean ( ... )

Reply

Re: OP anonymous May 4 2013, 18:59:45 UTC
A passing bystander who is really enjoying this story.

On why Lois can't conceive but Lex can without magical or technological intervention. Another path could be claiming Lois is sterile.She's a army brat and has been chasing stories recklessly for years before Superman debuted. It'd be real simple for her to have receive a injury of that nature with dangerous life she leads.

Reply

Re: anonymous May 4 2013, 19:18:21 UTC
Well, I'm just a random anon, and I will read whatever you write because this is amazing, but I'm not exactly fond of the jerk-Grey portrayal that's become so common in comics (and fiction in general, I guess). Making people act horrible to each other isn't necessary to give characters depth, and doesn't necessarily do so.

I kinda like boy scout Clark and appreciate that about him. And protective measures can fail, I think, even without aliens and weird mad science being involved.

Reply

Re: anonymous May 4 2013, 20:29:17 UTC
Jerk-Grey?

Reply

Re: anonymous May 4 2013, 20:31:45 UTC
You know, grey and grey mentality. Except instead of actually being "grey," the characters are all jerks.

Many writers seem to think that, in order for a character to be grey, they need to be jerks to everyone around them. That shows they have depth, supposedly.

Reply

Re: anonymous May 6 2013, 02:16:25 UTC
I'm curious on what kind of protection one can have when dealing with a kryptonian. Unless Clark carries around customized condoms I can't see regular cautionary measures being that useful to him.

Reply

Re: anonymous May 6 2013, 03:56:44 UTC
Well, Author!Anon is supposed to be studying for tax, so of course she has given this way, way too much thought.

So, there's a couple of questions; the first of which is would a drunk Lex Luthor and a slightly drunk Clark Kent high on red kryptonite bother with a condom? I'm pretty sure Clark was not planning on "getting lucky" that night, though I think Lex would be the kind of woman to take it upon herself to be prepared. The second is, would it do any good. Here there are at least two reasons why it might not, one being along the lines of "Man of steel, woman of Kleenex"--simply that a little latex membrane wouldn't stand a chance against Superman's super swimmers. The other is of course that couple of drunk people might screw up with the application ( ... )

Reply

Re: anonymous May 6 2013, 04:02:43 UTC
As the one who says that protection methods might fail, I meant first of all that I think most methods aren't 100 percent. There's always that .0001% chance that something slips through, right?

Sure, in life, you can just ignore that chance, but this is comic book world. Practically every other kid is one of a pair of twins. There are weirder things.

There is also the distant but existent possibility that Lex herself isn't "normal". This one probably didn't have lots of exposure to magic space rocks, but some of those mystery mad science experiments might have changed some part of her biology enough that normal contraceptive methods fail. Maybe??

(Look, I'm a Liberal Arts person. No science here.)

Reply

Re: anonymous May 6 2013, 05:03:39 UTC
Haha. I am the the liberal arts black sheep of my family (both my parents, all my aunts and uncles, and my brother are all scientists/doctors/engineers). So here is my ridiculous thought process (in stream of consciousness)--

Lex is a scientific genius no way she has unprotected sex she can do the cost benefit analysis and can probably figure out that using condoms is worth the reduced risk of stds but she's a scientific genius and she knows that people don't use them correctly and I think she'd have a back-up thing in case of drunkenness or stupidity if she were on the pill she might have forgotten to take one because she's a very busy woman but she would know that she's a very busy woman and might not get a chance to take it she would want something reliable that required no thought and left close to no room for human error like an IUD let's look at how often those fail *Wikipedia* oh basically never huh oh wait wasn't there that nifty wrongful life suit thing we learned about in torts *Google* ok its called wrongful pregnancy and ( ... )

Reply

Re: anonymous May 6 2013, 05:29:52 UTC
In retrospect, it seems like the above could be offensive/hurtful to some people. If it is, please accept my sincere apologies. I would delete it, but I can't because it's an anonymous post. :(

Reply

Re: FILL: Pharos 4/? Trigger: Dubcon (Fraud and mind-altering substances) anonymous May 4 2013, 15:13:17 UTC
This fill has me so EXCITED! I never knew I wanted FemaleLex until today but now I can't get enough of her.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up