(Untitled)

Apr 29, 2008 08:29

If Elena's cooking poisons someone, is it considered murder?

Death by Misadventure - 1
Accidental Homicide/Manslaughter - 2
Murder with a Deadly Weapon - 0
Poisoning - 0
Cruel and Unusual Punishment - 1

Leave a comment

Comments 41

im_not_a_rookie April 29 2008, 16:30:43 UTC
IT IS NOT THAT BAD!

Reply

yuberdemon April 29 2008, 16:34:09 UTC
Now, now, Elena. You and Shu both complained that I didn't do a public opinion poll, so now I am.

Reply

im_not_a_rookie April 29 2008, 16:37:49 UTC
This isn't-- But that wasn't about this! It was about you stalking me!

Reply

yuberdemon April 29 2008, 16:39:36 UTC
We already passed that resolution yesterday though. We can't vote on that twice. Today's is on your cooking and whether or not serving it to someone qualifies as deadly intent.

Reply


regenerable April 29 2008, 16:45:11 UTC
Don't think, so no. Just an unfortunate accident.

Reply

yuberdemon April 29 2008, 16:50:20 UTC
Accidental homicide then?

Reply

regenerable April 29 2008, 17:07:28 UTC
Who did she poison with her cooking?

Reply

yuberdemon April 29 2008, 17:08:54 UTC
It's all theoretical. If it did kill someone is it 'death by misadventure', 'accidental homicide', or just 'murder with a deadly weapon'?

Reply


tinminiskirt April 29 2008, 17:23:49 UTC
Accidental homicide, unless she deliberately poisoned it.

Reply

yuberdemon April 29 2008, 17:29:54 UTC
Thank you for your vote! Tell a friend!

Reply


astagnantpause April 29 2008, 21:11:18 UTC
"Manslaughter's" less leading than "accidental homicide," though.

Reply

yuberdemon April 29 2008, 21:15:01 UTC
Good point. I'll add that as one of the voting options.

Reply

astagnantpause April 29 2008, 21:20:28 UTC
Ideally it supplants "accidental homicide."

Reply

yuberdemon April 29 2008, 21:27:21 UTC
I would, but we already had a vote for 'accident homicide'. I could put them together. That way people know they basically mean the same thing, but someone was trying to be nicer.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up