What is the evidence that because someone has more control over their reality that it is not real? Whe nyou say 'real' do you mean 'giving the satisfactory sensation of being real in the way that the subject expects?'. Are you/the book assuming that all people expect the same 'realness' from their realities? Is such 'realness' really just a way of dogmatising towards a naturalistic idea of authenticity? Do you think that people who have not know the naturalistic reality you refer to as historic can really be told that thier realities are not authentic enough
( ... )
I don't mean "giving the satisfactory sensation of being real in the way that the subject expects", no. Reality is often very unsatisfying, and can sometimes feel quite unreal (or, perhaps more accurately, it can feel quite surreal). I don't equate "real" with "authentic" either. A person can have a perfectly authentic experience in an environment that is completely artificial
( ... )
Comments 3
Reply
Reply
If I was Supreme Academician I'd devote at least 4000 rubles per year to your research.
I want to read that book.
Reply
Leave a comment