(Untitled)

Sep 01, 2006 22:51

Who can name something realistic that is cooler than being able to cut anything with no effort (excluding atomic bonds and such of course)?

Leave a comment

Comments 15

claymaninflames September 2 2006, 03:07:48 UTC
You might think that you have 5 senses, but you only have 4. No one physically touches anything. What you feel is the repelling forces between your finger and the object which you "touch" but they never come in direct contact.

Reply

claymaninflames September 2 2006, 03:44:38 UTC
Oh, and it is entirely possible to walk through walls.

The only downside of that is the chances of every atom in your body making it to the other side of the wall are 1 in 10 to the trillion to the trillion tries.

Reply

claymaninflames September 2 2006, 03:45:01 UTC
(it increases your chances if you move fast i.e. speed of light)

Reply

zerox131 September 2 2006, 03:55:50 UTC
The first is really cool. The second really isn't.

Reply


flggnmllyrmnsdk September 2 2006, 05:02:19 UTC
One word, but not really realistic; telekinesis.

Reply

zerox131 September 2 2006, 05:06:06 UTC
Well that defeats the purpose.

Reply

flggnmllyrmnsdk September 2 2006, 06:44:26 UTC
Telekinesis still owns.

Reply

claymaninflames September 2 2006, 13:25:57 UTC
Technically it is possible, but its really not a power, its moving more towards the quantum theory (how you can walk through walls). You basically have to believe, and tell the atoms in an object that they are at point B rather than point A where they would normally be.

Every atom covers an infinite array of points in space, until you measure its place, then its place is definite.

Reply


kt2008 September 2 2006, 17:01:27 UTC
see i told you theres stuff cooler than being able to cut anything with no effort.

Reply

zerox131 September 2 2006, 17:29:55 UTC
Nah. I'd rather have the really really expensive diamond edged blade than the knowledge that when I touch something I don't actually touch it.

And you said wavy hair was cooler...

Reply

kt2008 September 2 2006, 17:55:14 UTC
thats cuz it is

Reply

insanedoodle58 September 4 2006, 21:29:36 UTC
Wouldn't a diamond blade crack under itself?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up