I'm trying to really understand addictions. I mean, on one level it's really easy to say that we're completely against this group of behaviors and objects that were taught to us as "Bad Things", but that's not a very insightful point of view to have. There are all sorts of addictions out there -- addictions to substances like cigarettes and more
(
Read more... )
Comments 21
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I might recommend treating her as an single entity, rather than a collection of separate entities. She is a living representation of systems theory- every aspect of her is affecting all other aspects of her. Ya can't separate her bipolar from her addiction.
Reply
Reply
Mmm interesting point. I suppose so. But the question is, are we addicted to removing the addiction or removing the addiction to remove the negative consequences of having said addiction?? Theoretically we could just reduce the negative side effects to a manageable level.
I think we decide what addictions are tolerable or not based on the negative consequences of having that addiction and our own personal and social/public ideas of health, vitality and what is right and wrong. After all the need to use substance D is being driven by our body just as much as the need to go to the bathroom when you wake up in the morning.
Most of us don't challenge or even realise our potentially addicted behaviour if it is perceived to be the norm. It is often when it is not accepted behaviour that we consider it like an absess to be removed.
Reply
Leave a comment