Leave a comment

Comments 7

mscongeniality December 29 2006, 21:34:04 UTC
Hmm...it sounds interesting, certainly. The more I hear of molecular gastronomy, the more I'm fairly sure it's not for me. I'm glad you enjoyed the dinner, though. Thank you for the writeup.

Reply

zorbtrauts December 29 2006, 21:38:40 UTC
Out of curiosity, what is it that is increasingly convincing you of this?

Reply

mscongeniality December 29 2006, 21:47:30 UTC
At first I kind of thought about what an interesting approach to fine dining it was, but the more I read about it and the restaurants that use it, the more I start to think that I probably just wouldn't enjoy it. To me, that's the heart of an excellent meal, just being able to enjoy it so as long as it would leave me feeling oof-center or uncomfortable, then it's probably not for me.

You know, if that makes any sense.

Reply

zorbtrauts December 29 2006, 22:05:59 UTC
What about it don't you think you'd enjoy?

Right now, I think that this field is in its infancy. Moto had a bit of a "Gee Whiz! Let me surprise and confuse you!" feel to it, that I suspect will fade as the cuisine matures. I mean, one day, perhaps, you will be able to walk in to a lovely restaurant and see something like "Sushi Roll in Hamburger Form, with Cloned Bluefin Akami and Pureed Rice Sauce on a Wasabi Brioche" and order it. Don't we all live for that day?

Reply


banefinn January 2 2007, 11:22:36 UTC
I think I'll have to try that place on my way back from Asia.

ps - I think Chocolate Lasagne is something of a paradigm shifter. I thought it was one of the coolest dishes I'd ever heard of, when you posted it. I tried using the theory to make chocolate sushi, but it never really panned out as well.

Reply


sshelba81 May 22 2008, 04:14:02 UTC
Thank god it's not me

Reply


Leave a comment

Up