(Untitled)

Apr 02, 2006 22:47

-the basics-name: lillian ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 26

qp4 April 3 2006, 13:12:09 UTC
You sure came up with lame excuses to people that already called you out on a few things. And I'm with evilel, what's the difference between fatties? And how is someone fat and it not their fault?

You went from a strong "yes" in the opening to a barely passable "I guess."

Reply

psilanthropist April 3 2006, 19:57:06 UTC
i think i've only been "called out" on the 2.3 vs. 1.3 thing. and i sure kicked everyone's ass in that department, i'm clearly right and that should count for something in terms of allocating lameness. see my reply to evilel. there are certain diseases which make it virtually impossible to regulate one's weight. they're uncommon, sure, but i'm not sure it's fair to make fun of that small minority. regular fatties are always fair game, though.

Reply

qp4 April 3 2006, 22:23:19 UTC
Wouldn't diseases that make it impossible to regulate weight make that person fall under the label of handicapped and open to ridicule on TWO criteria?

Think about it.

Reply

psilanthropist April 3 2006, 23:01:42 UTC
i'm not sure the diseases which cause people to be obese beyond their control qualify as a disability in the handicapped sense, seeing as you're not often born with them and many are eventually curable; two characterists not common amongst physical handicaps.

the potentional to make fun of people for more than one reason is exciting though, i won't lie.

Reply


no. jivinjamiemcgee April 3 2006, 13:39:03 UTC
you seem like a massive bitch, and you do not seem to have much to back it up with. i don't even know what to say. you and ur stuffed animals annoy me.

Reply

Re: no. psilanthropist April 3 2006, 20:00:46 UTC
i am a massive bitch. i haven't always been, but i sure am now. i'm incredibly intelligent, though; but i don't know what exactly you're looking for that would "back up" my bitchiness. maybe it's not intelligence. that picture was taken in my 9-year-old sister's room, but that's not really relevent and i have stuffed animals in my room too. i do live with my parents.

Reply

Re: no. jivinjamiemcgee April 3 2006, 20:15:00 UTC
awesome!

p.s. there's nothing wrong with stuffed animals. i have them too. but the ones i saw annoyed me. is that so wrong?

Reply

Re: no. psilanthropist April 3 2006, 20:41:22 UTC
seeing as i suspect that you only find my sister's stuffed animals annoying because you find me annoying, yes, there's something wrong with that. you're displacing your annoyance with me onto poor defenseless stuffed animals that never did anything to you. that's not fair.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: I suppose. psilanthropist April 3 2006, 20:04:49 UTC
thanks. i like your icon.

Reply


lukewevers April 4 2006, 00:58:52 UTC
I also skimmed through it. However, I like some of your answers and dislike others, therefore I am on the fence.

So in 20 words or less, convince me why you are elitist.

Hint, I like irony.

Reply

psilanthropist April 4 2006, 20:09:52 UTC
thanks for giving me the chance, but no thanks.

Reply


psilanthropist April 4 2006, 20:17:45 UTC
thanks, guys, it's been fun; but you aren't elite. to be elite is to be a class above everyone else in a specific area or many areas; and if this motley group of livejournalers has such an area, i sure as hell can't find it. your mathematical skills are lacking to the point where you perform simple addition incorrectly and then don't recognize the same addition done right. your vocabularies do not impress. at best, you're not fat, poor, handicapped, or elderly. if you feel that qualifies you to elitism, then continue. just bear in mind, the textbook definition of elitism is not thinking you're special; it's actually being special.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up